Skip to content

ci: split the dist-ohos job #141036

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2025
Merged

ci: split the dist-ohos job #141036

merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2025

Conversation

marcoieni
Copy link
Member

@marcoieni marcoieni commented May 15, 2025

This job is slow. We want to split it to make it faster.
Plus, we remove one large runner from CI.
r? @Kobzol

try-job: dist-ohos-*

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 15, 2025
@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 15, 2025
ci: split the dist-ohos job

try-job: `dist-ohos-*`
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 15, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 839534e with merge 591cdad...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 15, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 591cdad (591cdade90347ca281d574f419a5406c33400d57)

@marcoieni marcoieni marked this pull request as ready for review May 15, 2025 15:30
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 15, 2025
@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@rustbot ready

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented May 15, 2025

Seems pretty straightforward, thanks. I wonder why the ohos dist builders build src tarballs, but apparently multiple dist builders do that, even though it should be only done on x86-64. Anyway, that's a separate thing.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 15, 2025

📌 Commit 839534e has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 15, 2025
hkBst added a commit to hkBst/rust that referenced this pull request May 16, 2025
ci: split the dist-ohos job

try-job: `dist-ohos-*`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#140208 (Make well-formedness predicates no longer coinductive)
 - rust-lang#140957 (Add `#[must_use]` to Array::map)
 - rust-lang#141031 (Async drop fix for dropee from another crate (rust-lang#140858))
 - rust-lang#141036 (ci: split the dist-ohos job)
 - rust-lang#141051 (Remove some unnecessary erases)
 - rust-lang#141056 (Lowercase git url for rust-lang/enzyme.git)
 - rust-lang#141059 (HIR: explain in comment why `ExprKind::If` "then" is an `Expr`)
 - rust-lang#141070 (Do not emit help when shorthand from macro when suggest `?` or `expect`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0031282 into rust-lang:master May 17, 2025
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone May 17, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#141036 - marcoieni:split-dist-ohos, r=Kobzol

ci: split the dist-ohos job

try-job: `dist-ohos-*`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants