Don't unwrap in enzyme builds in case of missing llvm-config #142605
Merged
+14
−13
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Failed to set assignee to
|
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
ZuseZ4
force-pushed
the
autodiff-check-builds2
branch
from
4159a18 to
f1fea6c
Compare
|
huh, well in that case I guess |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2025
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - #141574 (impl `Default` for `array::IntoIter`) - #141608 (Add support for repetition to `proc_macro::quote`) - #142100 (rustdoc: make srcIndex no longer a global variable) - #142371 (avoid `&mut P<T>` in `visit_expr` etc methods) - #142517 (Windows: Use anonymous pipes in Command) - #142520 (alloc: less static mut + some cleanup) - #142588 (Generic ctx imprv) - #142605 (Don't unwrap in enzyme builds in case of missing llvm-config) - #142608 (Refresh module-level docs for `rustc_target::spec`) - #142618 (Lint about `console` calls in rustdoc JS) - #142620 (Remove a panicking branch in `BorrowedCursor::advance`) - #142631 (Dont suggest remove semi inside macro expansion for redundant semi lint) - #142632 (Update cargo) - #142635 (Temporarily add back -Zwasm-c-abi=spec) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2025
Rollup merge of #142605 - ZuseZ4:autodiff-check-builds2, r=oli-obk Don't unwrap in enzyme builds in case of missing llvm-config r? `@onur-ozkan` For some reason x.py was now panicking in this location, so I also removed the unwrap here. part 2 of #140000, there shouldn't be other locations where we check for llvm-config.
lnicola
pushed a commit
to lnicola/rust-analyzer
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2025
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#141574 (impl `Default` for `array::IntoIter`) - rust-lang/rust#141608 (Add support for repetition to `proc_macro::quote`) - rust-lang/rust#142100 (rustdoc: make srcIndex no longer a global variable) - rust-lang/rust#142371 (avoid `&mut P<T>` in `visit_expr` etc methods) - rust-lang/rust#142517 (Windows: Use anonymous pipes in Command) - rust-lang/rust#142520 (alloc: less static mut + some cleanup) - rust-lang/rust#142588 (Generic ctx imprv) - rust-lang/rust#142605 (Don't unwrap in enzyme builds in case of missing llvm-config) - rust-lang/rust#142608 (Refresh module-level docs for `rustc_target::spec`) - rust-lang/rust#142618 (Lint about `console` calls in rustdoc JS) - rust-lang/rust#142620 (Remove a panicking branch in `BorrowedCursor::advance`) - rust-lang/rust#142631 (Dont suggest remove semi inside macro expansion for redundant semi lint) - rust-lang/rust#142632 (Update cargo) - rust-lang/rust#142635 (Temporarily add back -Zwasm-c-abi=spec) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
r? @onur-ozkan
For some reason x.py was now panicking in this location, so I also removed the unwrap here.
part 2 of #140000, there shouldn't be other locations where we check for llvm-config.