Allow an Iterator to update a &mut [T], add IterReader #14568
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds two features to make it possible to transform an
Iterator<u8>
into aReader
. The first patch adds a method to mutable slices that allows it to be updated with anIterator<T>
without paying for the bounds cost. The second adds a Iterator adaptor,IterReader
, to provide thatReader
interface.I had two questions. First, are these named the right things? Second, should
IterReader
instead wrap anIterator<Result<u8, E>>
? This would allow you toIterReader::new(rdr.bytes())
, which could be useful if you want to apply some iterator transformations on a reader while still exporting the Reader interface, but I'd expect there'd be a lot of overhead annotating each byte with an error result.