test jemalloc 5.3.1

[mati865]

No description provided.

[mati865]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: ff8f2e5 (ff8f2e5241b4f46d1f09c01402745b8b5af03be7, parent: 18b439f84ec0b087283bac3356a1eeac53c60c5e)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (ff8f2e5): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read:

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, fix the regressions and do another perf run. Neutral or positive results will clear the label automatically.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 0.5%]	61
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.5%	[0.0%, 1.1%]	81
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-1.0%, -0.2%]	21
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-1.1%, -0.0%]	30
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-1.0%, 0.5%]	82

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 3.3%, secondary 4.9%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.3%	[0.8%, 12.0%]	204
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	5.3%	[0.7%, 17.4%]	103
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-5.3%	[-11.3%, -2.8%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	3.3%	[0.8%, 12.0%]	204

Cycles

Results (primary -2.4%, secondary 0.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.6%	[2.4%, 5.9%]	5
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.4%	[-2.4%, -2.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.4%	[-5.5%, -1.3%]	5
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.4%	[-2.4%, -2.4%]	1

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 492.463s -> 488.358s (-0.83%)
Artifact size: 394.15 MiB -> 394.40 MiB (0.07%)

[bjorn3]

Wall time is terrible. There are regressions as much as 25%.

[lqd]

the noise threshold is 25% on some of these benchmarks so I wouldn't necessarily use that as a strong proof.

thankfully everything else is also bad enough that we don't need wall-times to judge

[mati865]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: c25ed12 (c25ed12e3f021b425f317b56f7218b474268b190, parent: 7a38981b365e4c3672053b910fce9a14c6555ab9)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (c25ed12): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read:

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, fix the regressions and do another perf run. Neutral or positive results will clear the label automatically.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 0.5%]	52
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.4%	[0.1%, 0.9%]	74
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-1.0%, -0.2%]	21
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-1.1%, -0.0%]	25
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-1.0%, 0.5%]	73

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 3.5%, secondary 4.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.5%	[0.8%, 9.7%]	215
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.9%	[0.6%, 17.5%]	128
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-5.4%	[-10.7%, -2.5%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	3.5%	[0.8%, 9.7%]	215

Cycles

Results (primary -1.8%, secondary 5.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	7.4%	[6.6%, 8.2%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-1.8%, -1.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.8%	[-1.8%, -1.8%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-1.8%, -1.8%]	1

Binary size

Results (secondary -0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.1%]	7
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Bootstrap: 492.147s -> 505.437s (2.70%)
Artifact size: 394.26 MiB -> 394.44 MiB (0.05%)