Skip to content

don't ICE on a couple of missing lang items #31564

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 13, 2016

Conversation

durka
Copy link
Contributor

@durka durka commented Feb 11, 2016

This changes three ICEs to fatal errors.

I've grepped for lang_item.*expect and \.expect.*lang and didn't come up with any more. But, there could be more ICEs lurking.

I wasn't sure about a test because there already is a cfail test for missing lang items, but it only checks one.

Relevant to (already closed) #31477 #31480 #31558.
cc @LilRed

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2016

📌 Commit 433f347 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 13, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 433f347 with merge 1ab22d7...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2016
This changes three ICEs to fatal errors.

I've grepped for `lang_item.*expect` and `\.expect.*lang` and didn't come up with any more. But, there could be more ICEs lurking.

I wasn't sure about a test because there already _is_ a cfail test for missing lang items, but it only checks one.

Relevant to (already closed) #31477 #31480 #31558.
cc @LilRed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants