-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
incr.comp.: Speed up span hashing by caching expansion context hashes. #46562
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
r? @eddyb (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
@bors try |
⌛ Trying commit 1f8678acce1dfab84982dec5544460096a77a035 with merge b867f1811e7bb767d248b0ae46b8fabc16e83bed... |
☀️ Test successful - status-travis |
@Mark-Simulacrum, could you do a perf run please? |
1f8678a
to
fbcf14e
Compare
Perf run started. Sorry for the delay. |
Hey @Mark-Simulacrum, did that perf run ever finish? |
Yes. I generally forget to check back in; they auto-queue and finish within 4 hours at most, and the URLs are fairly easy to generate. Eventually this will be automated... |
Thanks @Mark-Simulacrum! I see now how I can compose these URLs myself. |
This is now ready for review, @nikomatsakis. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #46550) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
fbcf14e
to
0b4c2cc
Compare
Rebased. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 0b4c2cc has been approved by |
incr.comp.: Speed up span hashing by caching expansion context hashes. This PR fixes the performance regressions from #46338. r? @nikomatsakis
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
incr.comp.: Revert hashing optimization that caused regression. This PR reverts part of #46562 which caused [a regression in the crossbeam rust-icci](https://travis-ci.org/rust-icci/crossbeam/builds/316574774) test. I don't know what the problem is exactly yet. Fortunately, the problematic part is also the less important one, so reverting should not have much impact on performance. r? @eddyb
This PR fixes the performance regressions from #46338.
r? @nikomatsakis