Skip to content

Conversation

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr commented Mar 6, 2018

This is a test to see if we can cache stage0.
cc #48412

edit:
log 1: https://travis-ci.org/rust-lang/rust/builds/349703962
I force pushed to see if I could see any effect of this in the second log, but I am not sure if this will work / if the cache is retained per PR or if other PR builds that happened in between overwrote the cache.
log 2: https://travis-ci.org/rust-lang/rust/builds/349737662

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 6, 2018
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr force-pushed the travis_cache_stage0 branch from 3c0d943 to 6cc131a Compare March 6, 2018 10:08
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr changed the title [TEST] travis: cache stage0 travis: cache stage0 Mar 6, 2018
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr changed the title travis: cache stage0 test: travis: cache stage0 Mar 6, 2018
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the PR! Unfortunately though we've had pretty bad luck with caches and Travis historically. They tend to not work well across OSX/Linux/AppVeyor as they increase in size and only very irregularly get cleaned.

That being said the next-best solution we have is sccache which has historically been much more reliable and should perform similarly!

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, closing.

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the travis_cache_stage0 branch August 28, 2018 17:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants