-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Prefer partition_point
to look up assoc items
#86392
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand correctly, this is now doing a
binary_search_by
to use a binary search to find any matching key, and then does two more binary searches (left and right of the item that was found), to find the first one. Why not just use apartition_point(|| .. < ..)
to find the first key directly?That is, if you just remove the match and the Err case, and change the
!=
to<
, it still works and does the same thing, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(And unless there's tons of duplicated keys, it can be a lot faster to only use partition_point for finding the lower bound, and just search linearly for the upper bound. See also the comment on line 128 before the change.
Edit: Oh, since this just returns an
impl Iterator
, it can just not look for the upper_bound at all and return.take_while(..)
on the slice starting at the lower bound.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh neat, indeed we could improve it more. I'll open a PR to follow up it, it'd be great if you could review it, thanks!