Skip to content

Rollup of 6 pull requests #97574

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
May 31, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 6 pull requests #97574

merged 17 commits into from
May 31, 2022

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

ChayimFriedman2 and others added 17 commits May 24, 2022 21:57
This transforms `|| expr` into `|| { expr; }`.
Currently, `Box<T>` gets `noalias`, meaning it has
the same rules as `&mut T`. This is
sparsely documented, even though it can have quite
a big impact on unsafe code using box. Therefore,
these rules are documented here, with a big warning
that they are not normative and subject to change,
since we have not yet committed to an aliasing model
and the state of `Box<T>` is especially uncertain.
…me-display, r=jsha

Improve settings theme display

This is a follow-up of rust-lang#96958. In this PR, I changed how the theme radio buttons are displayed and improved their look as well.

It now looks like this:

![Screenshot from 2022-05-17 20-46-20](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/168887703-a01e3bd5-9644-4012-ac11-2ae7bacd6be6.png)
![Screenshot from 2022-05-17 20-46-12](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/168887707-132f8b2d-1163-462f-b7dd-f861121bdee7.png)

You can test it [here](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/improve-settings-theme-display/doc/foo/index.html).

r? `@jsha`
Document the current aliasing rules for `Box<T>`.

Currently, `Box<T>` gets `noalias`, meaning it has the same rules as `&mut T`. This is sparsely documented, even though it can have quite a big impact on unsafe code using box. Therefore, these rules are documented here, with a big warning that they are not normative and subject to change, since we have not yet committed to an aliasing model and the state of `Box<T>` is especially uncertain.

If you have any suggestions and improvements, make sure to leave them here. This is mostly intended to inform people about what is currently going on (to prevent misunderstandings such as [Jon Gjengset's Box aliasing](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EY7Wi9fV5bk)).

This is supposed to _only document current UB_ and not add any new guarantees or rules.
…dd-semicolon, r=oli-obk

Suggest adding a semicolon to a closure without block

This transforms `|| expr` into `|| { expr; }`.

Closes rust-lang#97359.
…nto, r=dtolnay

Stabilize `toowned_clone_into`

Closes rust-lang#41263
FCP has been done: rust-lang#41263 (comment)
Add doc alias `memset` to `write_bytes`

I were looking for `memset` in rust, but the docs only pointed me to `slice::fill`.

With only the old aliases, one might write code like this, which is incorrect if the memory is uninitialized.
``` Rust
core::slice::from_raw_parts(ptr, len).fill(0)
```
…nieu

Remove `memset` alias from `fill_with`.

In https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Unsafe.20and.20Safe.20versions.20of.20APIs.20both.20getting.20the.20same.20alias/near/284413029 `@Amanieu` pointed out that we had this, which is not really right.

In our guidelines we say that we will "not add an alias for a function that's only somewhat similar or related", which applies here. Memset doesn't take a closure, not even conceptually.
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels May 31, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 31, 2022

📌 Commit efd2519 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label May 31, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 31, 2022

⌛ Testing commit efd2519 with merge d35d972...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 31, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing d35d972 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 31, 2022
@bors bors merged commit d35d972 into rust-lang:master May 31, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone May 31, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (d35d972): comparison url.

Instruction count

  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
1.1% 1.1% 3
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) N/A N/A 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-1.9% -1.9% 1
All 😿🎉 (primary) N/A N/A 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2

  2. number of relevant changes 2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.