Skip to content

Use repr(C) when depending on struct layout in ptr tests #97851

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2022

Conversation

saethlin
Copy link
Member

@saethlin saethlin commented Jun 7, 2022

The test depends on the layout of this struct Pair, so it should use repr(C) instead of the default repr(Rust).

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 7, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @thomcc

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 7, 2022
@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented Jun 8, 2022

Nice catch.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 8, 2022

📌 Commit 5dd5244 has been approved by thomcc

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 8, 2022
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
Use repr(C) when depending on struct layout in ptr tests

The test depends on the layout of this struct `Pair`, so it should use `repr(C)` instead of the default `repr(Rust)`.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#97595 (Remove unwrap from get_vtable)
 - rust-lang#97597 (Preserve unused pointer to address casts)
 - rust-lang#97819 (Recover `import` instead of `use` in item)
 - rust-lang#97823 (Recover missing comma after match arm)
 - rust-lang#97851 (Use repr(C) when depending on struct layout in ptr tests)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1660b4b into rust-lang:master Jun 8, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone Jun 8, 2022
@saethlin saethlin deleted the use-repr-c branch June 14, 2022 21:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants