You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since we don't record cache misses for perf.rlo, it does not make sense to show the number of cache misses (it will always be the same as the "# of invocations" right next to it).
When recording cache misses and cache hits, then invocations is hits + misses. When not recording cache hits, then invocations is misleading because it only counts the cache misses.
On zulip we settled on "full executions" as the new title for the "invocations" column. This subsumes "query provider invocations" and regular (thus uncached) function invocations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since we don't record cache misses for perf.rlo, it does not make sense to show the number of cache misses (it will always be the same as the "# of invocations" right next to it).
When recording cache misses and cache hits, then
invocations
ishits + misses
. When not recording cache hits, theninvocations
is misleading because it only counts the cache misses.On zulip we settled on "full executions" as the new title for the "invocations" column. This subsumes "query provider invocations" and regular (thus uncached) function invocations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: