Sourcery refactored main branch

[sourcery-ai]

Branch main refactored by Sourcery.

If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.

See our documentation here.

Run Sourcery locally

Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:

• VS Code
• PyCharm

Review changes via command line

To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the main branch, then run:

git fetch origin sourcery/main
git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
git reset HEAD^

Help us improve this pull request!

[github-actions]

👈 Launch a binder notebook on branch s-weigand/flake8-nb/sourcery/main

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #201 (bd1eff0) into main (bac52ee) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #201   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            5         5           
  Lines          393       387    -6     
  Branches        69        70    +1     
=========================================
- Hits           393       387    -6     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
flake8_nb/__main__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
flake8_nb/flake8_integration/cli.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
flake8_nb/flake8_integration/formatter.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
flake8_nb/parsers/cell_parsers.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
flake8_nb/parsers/notebook_parsers.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bac52ee...bd1eff0. Read the comment docs.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.02%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	4.66 ⭐	4.70 ⭐	0.04 👎
Method Length	51.22 ⭐	50.91 ⭐	-0.31 👍
Working memory	7.10 🙂	7.05 🙂	-0.05 👍
Quality	75.83% ⭐	75.85% ⭐	0.02% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	1231	1223	-8

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
flake8_nb/main.py	80.25% ⭐	81.57% ⭐	1.32% 👍
flake8_nb/flake8_integration/cli.py	74.31% 🙂	74.44% 🙂	0.13% 👍
flake8_nb/flake8_integration/formatter.py	72.89% 🙂	73.87% 🙂	0.98% 👍
flake8_nb/parsers/cell_parsers.py	78.71% ⭐	78.71% ⭐	0.00%
flake8_nb/parsers/notebook_parsers.py	75.39% ⭐	75.09% ⭐	-0.30% 👎

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
flake8_nb/parsers/notebook_parsers.py	get_notebook_code_cells	16 🙂	130 😞	9 🙂	52.35% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods
flake8_nb/flake8_integration/cli.py	Flake8NbApplication.set_flake8_option	14 🙂	90 🙂	12 😞	53.54% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
flake8_nb/flake8_integration/cli.py	get_notebooks_from_args	12 🙂	119 🙂	10 😞	55.00% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
flake8_nb/parsers/cell_parsers.py	notebook_cell_to_intermediate_dict	2 ⭐	95 🙂	11 😞	65.80% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
flake8_nb/flake8_integration/formatter.py	map_notebook_error	3 ⭐	69 🙂	10 😞	70.52% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!