Skip to content

be Java 9 compatible #34

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
SethTisue merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2017
Merged

be Java 9 compatible #34

SethTisue merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2017

Conversation

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

@SethTisue SethTisue commented Sep 26, 2017

work around scala/scala-dev#304

fixes #33

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

SethTisue commented Sep 26, 2017

I verified locally (via publishLocal and then using it in the scala-parser-combinators repo) that this actually fixes the problem

@SethTisue SethTisue merged commit 9a3a8af into scala:master Sep 26, 2017
@SethTisue SethTisue deleted the java9-friendly branch September 26, 2017 21:16
@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

SethTisue commented Oct 16, 2017 •
edited
Loading

well, this turned out not to be necessary, because there will be Scala 2.10.7 and 0.13.17 releases. I'll leave the package declaration in regardless, on vague general "the empty package is evil" grounds

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@SethTisue