-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Improve parameter type inference error messaging #18190
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,14 +1,16 @@ | ||
-- [E081] Type Error: tests/neg/i11350.scala:1:39 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
1 |class A1[T](action: A1[T] ?=> String = "") // error | ||
| ^ | ||
| Missing parameter type | ||
| Could not infer type for parameter evidence$1 of anonymous function | ||
| | ||
| I could not infer the type of the parameter evidence$1. | ||
| What I could infer was: A1[<?>] | ||
| Partially inferred type for the parameter: A1[<?>] | ||
| | ||
| Expected type for the whole anonymous function: (A1[<?>]) ?=> String | ||
-- [E081] Type Error: tests/neg/i11350.scala:2:39 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
2 |class A2[T](action: A1[T] ?=> String = summon[A1[T]]) // error | ||
| ^ | ||
| Missing parameter type | ||
| Could not infer type for parameter evidence$2 of anonymous function | ||
| | ||
| Partially inferred type for the parameter: A1[<?>] | ||
| | ||
| I could not infer the type of the parameter evidence$2. | ||
| What I could infer was: A1[<?>] | ||
| Expected type for the whole anonymous function: (A1[<?>]) ?=> String |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,14 +1,18 @@ | ||
-- [E081] Type Error: tests/neg/i17183.scala:11:24 --------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
11 |def test = Context(f = (_, _) => ???) // error // error | ||
| ^ | ||
| Missing parameter type | ||
| Could not infer type for parameter _$1 of anonymous function | ||
| | ||
| I could not infer the type of the parameter _$1 of expanded function: | ||
| (_$1, _$2) => ???. | ||
| In expanded function: | ||
| (_$1, _$2) => ??? | ||
| | ||
| Expected type for the whole anonymous function: MyFunc | ||
-- [E081] Type Error: tests/neg/i17183.scala:11:27 --------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
11 |def test = Context(f = (_, _) => ???) // error // error | ||
| ^ | ||
| Missing parameter type | ||
| Could not infer type for parameter _$2 of anonymous function | ||
| | ||
| In expanded function: | ||
| (_$1, _$2) => ??? | ||
| | ||
| I could not infer the type of the parameter _$2 of expanded function: | ||
| (_$1, _$2) => ???. | ||
| Expected type for the whole anonymous function: MyFunc |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if it would be possible to report
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be possible, but I'm not sure it's desirable, I think here we need to show some internals
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The internal names of
_
and other unamed variables are only useful to us. Never to the user as they cannot use them in the source.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, but we need to show the desugarring anyways, as the issue might be that the user missunderstood how
_
worksAnd therefore need names in the desugarring (but these could be something else than
_$1
)