Skip to content

Tweak MissingIdent's explanation #5994

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 27, 2019

Conversation

dwijnand
Copy link
Member

Firstly, split out the "for instance" clause so it doesn't get
confusing. Also backticks-escape the name (in my case name was "the"
which was quite confusing, and funny). Finally, rather than "accuse"
the user for forgetting, rephrase to "an import is missing". And end
the sentence with a period.

Copy link
Member

@dottybot dottybot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello, and thank you for opening this PR! 🎉

All contributors have signed the CLA, thank you! ❤️

Have an awesome day! ☀️

Firstly, split out the "for instance" clause so it doesn't get
confusing.  Also backticks-escape the name (in my case name was "the"
which was quite confusing, and funny).  Finally, rather than "accuse"
the user for forgetting, rephrase to "an import is missing".  And end
the sentence with a period.
@dwijnand dwijnand force-pushed the tweak-MissingIdent-explanation branch from dd42361 to ae2328f Compare February 27, 2019 18:47
This is because "instance" already has meaning in Scala.
@smarter smarter merged commit c1c1db7 into scala:master Feb 27, 2019
@dwijnand dwijnand deleted the tweak-MissingIdent-explanation branch February 27, 2019 21:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants