Skip to content

Flatten term type tree modules #6193

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki commented Mar 29, 2019

No description provided.

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki force-pushed the flatten-term-type-tree-modules branch from 171529a to d4d3e68 Compare March 29, 2019 12:10
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki marked this pull request as ready for review March 29, 2019 12:10
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki removed their assignment Mar 29, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@liufengyun liufengyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, expose Terms and Types will definitely improve usability.

I'm a little reserved about that we expose all TypeTrees by default, as from experience they are not that useful, and they tend to cause confusion with types. No need to address in this PR, but keep an eye in the evolution of the API.

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki merged commit 5163b70 into scala:master Apr 1, 2019
@ghost ghost removed the stat:needs review label Apr 1, 2019
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki deleted the flatten-term-type-tree-modules branch April 1, 2019 15:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants