avn compatibility with current Node.js versions

[MikeMcC399]

avn is listed in the Compatibility Testing table as being compatible with Node.js 14, however there are multiple reports listed in avn issues of problems with Node.js > 10. The avn site has not been updated for over three years.

Should avn still be listed?

Node.js 14 enters end-of-life status on April 30, 2023, so the compatibility table using Node.js 14.15.0 as reference version becomes of limited use if it does not cover currently supported Node.js versions.

[shadowspawn]

Actually I only used 14.5.0 as an example three part numeric version rather than a reference version. In fact the testing fixtures are all using versions of 10.x!

I know a few of the node version managers are not currently being developed and multiple are fairly inactive. I could do a revisit and downgrade the ones which are not working with modern Node.js versions.

[MikeMcC399]

@shadowspawn

Actually I only used 14.5.0 as an example three part numeric version rather than a reference version.

I had a feeling that might be the case!

I know a few of the node version managers are not currently being developed and multiple are fairly inactive. I could do a revisit and downgrade the ones which are not working with modern Node.js versions.

If you are able to revisit that would make the list much more useful. From my perspective, I would expect that at least Node.js LTS would be supported, better still though would be all of the versions currently listed in the Node.js Release schedule table, also with Node.js 20 just around the corner.

BTW: Thanks for your related comment in the Cypress issues list 🙂 !

[shadowspawn]

A small update. I started looking into avn. The issue I reproduced is that avn setup fails on on node >10. Once installed (using an old node version) avn does allow changing to new node versions when changing directories. The project is not currently being maintained.

• Is this project officially unsupported? wbyoung/avn#109
• avn setup is not working properly with node >10 wbyoung/avn#77

[shadowspawn]

All of the node version managers other than avn have had commits within the last year.

[shadowspawn]

I am playing about with what to do with avn. I am reluctant to simply delete it, but that is a fallback! How about a notes column in the compatibility table?

https://github.com/shadowspawn/node-version-usage/tree/feature/deprecate-avn#compatibility-testing

[MikeMcC399]

@shadowspawn

A notes column would do the trick. Good suggestion!

Maybe also a comment at the bottom of the table Compatibility testing to explain the meanings of the column headings? I misread the meaning of the table and thought it meant that the tools ran on the version 14.5.0, whereas you are only stating that it understands the format xx.yy.zz, etc.

[shadowspawn]

Hmm, I wasn't entirely happy with the numbers at the top, and your confusion was understandable.

I moved the example versions out of the title row, dropped to 10 so does not look like LTS related, and put in code block so looks a bit more example-ish. Is it more self-evident now, or do you feel still in need of an explanation?

Utility	simple	leading v	partial	Unix EOL	No EOL	Win EOL	Notes
	10.1.2	v10.1.2	10.2
asdf	✅	✅	❌	✅	✅	❌

[MikeMcC399]

I think you need to say somewhere that these are example Node.js version formats only. Maybe write "e.g." in front of each version, add something into the Notes column or write a text comment immediately after the table ends?

Your suggestion so far is in any case an improvement on the previous presentation! 👍🏻

[shadowspawn]

Maybe write "e.g." in front of each version, add something into the Notes column

For amusement, I had already tried both of those but didn't like the appearance or resulting increased table width.

or write a text comment immediately after the table ends?

I'll stop deluding myself that does not need it, and do that. 😆

[shadowspawn]

Thanks for feedback and suggestions @MikeMcC399

[shadowspawn]

avn repo now archived:

This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 7, 2023. It is now read-only.