Skip to content

Adds per-project visibility querying on schema methods #76

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 13, 2015

Conversation

francoisjacques
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -945,23 +945,39 @@ def followers(self, entity):

return self._call_rpc('followers', params)

def schema_entity_read(self):
def schema_entity_read(self, project_entity=None):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there! It would be great if we could have a `:param: style docstring for this new parameter - just for consistency with other methods! Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ya, agree, will do

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cheers!

@manneohrstrom
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the fixes! Looks sweet! 🍰

francoisjacques and others added 5 commits March 13, 2015 13:40
@francoisjacques francoisjacques force-pushed the 27860_project_customization branch from 166b3b8 to 3a06ab7 Compare March 13, 2015 17:41
francoisjacques added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2015
Adds per-project visibility querying on schema methods
@francoisjacques francoisjacques merged commit 278360f into master Mar 13, 2015
@jfboismenu jfboismenu deleted the 27860_project_customization branch April 5, 2018 00:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants