Forbid License, Licence and Contribute sections #123
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for the merge! 😃 |
This was referenced Oct 12, 2020
strowk
added a commit
to strowk/awesome-seed-rs
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2020
strowk
added a commit
to strowk/awesome-seed-rs
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2020
MartinKavik
pushed a commit
to seed-rs/awesome-seed-rs
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2020
DmytroLitvinov
pushed a commit
to DmytroLitvinov/awesome-flake8-extensions
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2020
mischah
added a commit
to RyanZim/awesome-npm-scripts
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Having a license in the Readme is now »forbidden« since the preferred method is to rely on GitHub's license detection. See: sindresorhus/awesome-lint#123 So we are fine with having a LICENSE file in the repos root.
mischah
added a commit
to micromata/awesome-css-learning
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2022
Having a license in the Readme is nowan error since the preferred method is to rely on GitHub's license detection. See: sindresorhus/awesome-lint#123 So we are fine with having a LICENSE file in the repos root.
mischah
added a commit
to micromata/awesome-css-learning
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2022
Having a license in the Readme is nowan error since the preferred method is to rely on GitHub's license detection. See: sindresorhus/awesome-lint#123 So we are fine with having a LICENSE file in the repos root.
mischah
added a commit
to micromata/awesome-javascript-learning
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2022
Having a license in the Readme is now an error since the preferred method is to rely on GitHub's license detection. See: sindresorhus/awesome-lint#123 So we are fine with having a LICENSE file in the repos root.
mischah
added a commit
to micromata/awesome-javascript-learning
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2022
Having a license in the Readme is now an error since the preferred method is to rely on GitHub's license detection. See: sindresorhus/awesome-lint#123 So we are fine with having a LICENSE file in the repos root.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR backports and enforces new rules discussed with @sindresorhus in sindresorhus/awesome#1860 :
Contributing.Contributeis no longer allowed, as per Sync PR template with ToC rules about silenced sections awesome#1860 (comment)LicenceorLicensesection. The preferred method is to rely on GitHub's license detection. See Sync PR template with ToC rules about silenced sections awesome#1860 (comment)This PR related to: