🚀 Enterprise AI Development Workflow System Enhancement

[jeremylongshore]

Overview

I've developed a comprehensive enhancement to the ai-dev-tasks concept that transforms it into an enterprise-grade AI development workflow system with Claude Code integration.

🎯 Repository Location

Enhanced Version: https://github.com/jeremylongshore/ai-dev-tasks

🚀 Major Enhancements

1. Professional Template Library (22 Templates)

• Complete set of production-ready templates with standardized metadata
• Dynamic {{DATE}} placeholder system
• Cross-referenced documentation structure
• Templates: PRD, ADR, Architecture, Market Research, User Stories, Risk Register, etc.

2. Dual AI Assistant Integration

• Claude Code CLI: One-paste workflow for complete beginners
• Cursor IDE: Structured workflow with .cursorrules/ files
• Enterprise Pipeline: 17-question interactive intake system

3. Enterprise Production Features

• CI/CD Integration: Automated template verification via GitHub Actions
• Interactive Form System: Node.js CLI for structured input
• Governance Controls: CODEOWNERS protection and PR templates
• Output Validation: Automated validation scripts

4. Comprehensive Documentation

• SOPs: Standard Operating Procedures for template usage
• Multi-user Support: Beginner to expert workflows
• Integration Rules: Clear guidelines for system usage
• Quality Assurance: Template verification automation

🎯 Use Cases Supported

• Complete Beginners: Simple one-paste Claude Code workflow
• Developers: Structured Cursor IDE integration
• Enterprise Teams: Governance-controlled workflow with CI/CD
• Interactive Setup: Form-based structured input system

🏗️ Technical Architecture

• Template System: Read-only templates generating working documents
• No Complex Dependencies: Simple workflow without containerization
• CI/CD Ready: GitHub Actions integration
• Multi-AI Support: Claude Code CLI + Cursor IDE
• Standard Utilities: Makefile integration

💭 Discussion Points

1. Contribution Approach: Given the comprehensive nature of these enhancements, what would be the best way to contribute them back?

2. Integration Strategy: Would you prefer:

   • A series of smaller PRs breaking down the enhancements?
   • A new branch with the complete enhanced system?
   • Documentation of the enhanced approach for others to reference?

3. Collaboration: Happy to discuss how these enhancements align with your vision and roadmap.

📊 Impact

This enhancement maintains the simplicity of your original concept while adding:

• Enterprise-grade features
• Comprehensive AI assistant integration
• Production-ready workflows
• Quality assurance systems
• Multi-skill-level support

I'd love to discuss how to best contribute these enhancements back to the original project!

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[designorant]

@jeremylongshore By pointing this PR to https://github.com/jeremylongshore/ai-dev-tasks and not https://github.com/jeremylongshore/ai-dev-tasks/tree/feature/enterprise-ai-dev-workflow-system (which I guess matches the "enhancements" listed here), and the fact that you opened up #48 as if it was supposed to close this massive list of enhancements, I arrive at this diagnosis:

Not only you're trying to rewrite a simple, yet effective set of instructions with what looks like AI slop, you're also likely overdosing on Claude Code to a point you're risking becoming a nuisance to those who are trying to help. Most of this makes no sense, and is horrendeously taxing to go through.

Edit: Crossed out "risking" following authors response.

[jeremylongshore]

Thank you for your feedback. Without people like u I wouldn’t know where to self improve.

If you could explain what exactly u don’t comprehend I will be more than willing to help explain it.

Thank you for understanding the landscape of today’s technological environment has brought multiple users to your field that are not as keen in all areas of operation.

What has happened was, I quess, I accidentally forked this guys work where it seems seventeen people like my enhancements.

https://github.com/jeremylongshore/ai-development-intent-solutions

The problem is I wanted to credit the original author (snarktank) of the four templates, rightfully so. I have tried to do the right thing by requesting a review.

If you are serious about helping me curve what u think to be insatiable, I will be more then happy to listen but blunt tactics layered in narcissism is certainly unwarranted.

I wanted to update the four templates with the additional templates. Yes, I used ai in helping develop. That fact doesn’t take away from the hours I spent critiquing it and going back and forth with ai.

Once again I apologize if my work Is hard to comprehend. I look forward to finding the slights that need improvement so I can focus on them. If you want to email me or dm me you can find all my contacts in my profile.

I understand it’s a tough landscape to navigate and I am working on contributing to the open source community. I do not intend to waste time or energy of other people.

Maybe I did something wrong maybe I didn’t, I would need specifics. Like I said, i wanted to fork snarktank repo. Somehow in my haste and carelessness on top of being new I made a mistake and forked this repo which somehow has got 17 stars so far. Please help me straighten this out if u can. I thought about opening a support ticket to switch the fork.

https://github.com/jeremylongshore/ai-development-intent-solutions

I did request an issue as opposed to a pull maybe that was wrong. I don’t know. In the spirit of open source I am trying to engage and help sorry it didn’t work for you but reread my letter and maybe u can figure out a way to lift a brother up.

I eagerly await your response.

Heres my pic so u can put it on your dashboard so u can remember my face in case we ever get the chance to meet. Will be a fun conversation.

Anything u can do to help. . . .see below did my pics come through look I’m a fun guy why u gotta be such an ass?

[jeremylongshore]

Oh yeah can u go over my other repos? i need a solid coach and or mentor thanks!!! Connect with me on all my socials. …

Look here’s my hot wife. . . 16 years married crazy…. You married?

[jeremylongshore]

How do i get this as a fork did i do it wrong or attach the wrong file ? https://github.com/jeremylongshore/ai-development-intent-solutions?tab=readme-ov-file#quick-start

[carwei]

@jeremylongshore, I think you are shooting yourself in the foot here. @designorant might have been a bit blunt, but now you're just proving his point.

The changes you made are basically as "off-topic" as your comments about your personality and family, for this simple reason: This is not ment to be an enterprise solution. If you are using it in an enterprise environment successfully, it makes more sense to keep your fork as a fork. And credit this repo in the READ.me of your fork.

This repo is for entry level coders making small AI projects, not enterprise settings. AI will help you iterate on anything you ask it to, but you moved too far away from the projects scope. Correct me if I'm wrong, @snarktank.

[jeremylongshore]

I guess u missed the sarcasm in my prose. Your opinion is fully noted. Cheers!

Ps reread my comment to Mical. Review the link that was forked on some stuology guys repo.

My work I continued off of snarks work was tied to the wrong repo because I'm retarted and I wanted to get it to the right place so if that makes any sense ....

It's late here u can reach me a hundred different ways through my profile links to continue the discussion.

Sorry it's thrown everyone for a loop. I saw his YouTube video and was trying to enhance it that's why I wrote the issue. It has helped me and I was trying to do some extra work to see what I could accomplish.

As always thanks for the feedback.

Later.

[carwei]

I guess u missed the sarcasm in my prose. Your opinion is fully noted. Cheers!

Then you've just wasted my time. I was genuinely trying to be helpful to you. I can enjoy a sprinkle of sarcasm, even if it's usually a bit hit-and-miss when used online. If it's intentional and in this volume that you're using it, I think 'trolling' is a better term for it. If you want to contribute, you'll probably need to change your strategy. But it's not my job to tell you how. You have been given all the direction you should need to self-improve and reflect; now it's up to you.

[carwei]

PS. @jeremylongshore Since you seem to waste time intentionally, I'll block you for the sake of my own productivity.

[jeremylongshore]

Reread my entire response. Have u looked I mean really looked at what was trying to accomplish. ?

Relax it's all good I'm not trolling i spent a ton of time on working on all this if it doesn't make sense its like I said my bad but if u take more then 5 minutes to study and read what I am was trying to do it would make more sense.

Look at it from my end. U guys don't know me - the approach was off in my humble opinion possibly on all ends. Just look at the fork that's on the wrong repo that's what I'm trying to fork that's why I didn't fork it and sent the issue. It's confusing my bad.

Geez.

I guess u missed the sarcasm in my prose. Your opinion is fully noted. Cheers!

Ps reread my comment to Mical. Review the link that was forked on some stuology guys repo.

My work I continued off of snarks work was tied to the wrong repo because I'm retarted and I wanted to get it to the right place so if that makes any sense ....

It's late here u can reach me a hundred different ways through my profile links to continue the discussion.

Sorry it's thrown everyone for a loop. I saw his YouTube video and was trying to enhance it that's why I wrote the issue. It has helped me and I was trying to do some extra work to see what I could accomplish.

As always thanks for the feedback.

Later.