-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
TargetUnit service #45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
- Added `RedminePool.ts` to manage MySQL connection pooling, including methods for pool creation and termination. - Created `RedminePool.test.ts` to validate the functionality of the `RedminePool` class, ensuring proper pool management and error handling. These additions enhance database connection management and improve test coverage for the Redmine integration.
- Updated the `RedminePool.test.ts` file to enhance type safety by defining a `PoolMock` interface. - Refactored the test setup to improve readability and maintainability, including clearer type assertions for pool properties. - Adjusted the formatting of the credentials object for better clarity. These changes improve the robustness of the tests for the `RedminePool` class, ensuring better type checking and organization.
- Updated the `RedminePool` class to include error handling during pool creation and termination, ensuring that meaningful error messages are thrown when failures occur. - Added new test cases in `RedminePool.test.ts` to validate the graceful handling of pool creation and termination errors. These changes improve the robustness of the `RedminePool` class by ensuring it can handle errors effectively, enhancing overall reliability.
- Added `ProjectUnit` interface to define the structure of Project Unit data. - Created `IRedmineRepository` interface for fetching project units. - Implemented `RedmineRepository` class to handle database queries and map results to `ProjectUnit`. - Introduced SQL query for retrieving project units based on time entries. - Developed `RedmineService` class to provide a service layer for accessing project units. Implements Redmine project unit management Adds functionality to retrieve and manage project units from Redmine. Introduces a repository pattern for data access, a service layer for business logic, and a data transfer object for representing project unit information. This provides a structured way to interact with the Redmine database and retrieve project-related data.
- Modified the SQL query in `queries.ts` to adjust the date range for fetching time entries. - The new query now correctly calculates the start and end dates for the past week, ensuring accurate data retrieval. This change enhances the accuracy of time entry data fetched from the Redmine API, improving reporting and analysis capabilities.
- Introduced `RedmineRepository.test.ts` to validate the functionality of the `RedmineRepository` class, including tests for mapping rows to `ProjectUnit` and error handling. - Created `RedmineService.test.ts` to ensure the `RedmineService` correctly retrieves project units from the repository. These additions enhance test coverage for the Redmine integration, ensuring the reliability of data retrieval and error management in the repository and service layers.
This change replaces the RedmineService and its related components with TargetUnitService to align with updated domain terminology. All references, files, and test cases have been renamed or updated to maintain consistency.
This change renames the `ProjectUnit` interface to `TargetUnit` and updates all related references in the repository and service layers. The modifications ensure consistency in terminology and improve clarity in the codebase. All relevant tests have been adjusted accordingly to reflect this change.
…tUnitRepository and related tests This change updates the method names in the `ITargetUnitRepository`, `TargetUnitRepository`, and `TargetUnitService` classes to reflect the new terminology. All corresponding test cases have been modified to ensure consistency and maintain functionality. This refactor enhances clarity in the codebase by aligning method names with the updated domain terminology.
Removed IPoolProvider abstraction and updated queries and related tests for consistency and clarity.
Revised the SQL query in `queries.ts` to improve readability by restructuring the WHERE clause and enhancing the GROUP BY and ORDER BY sections.
Eliminated the console error logging in the `getTargetUnits` method of the `TargetUnitRepository` class to streamline error handling. This change enhances the clarity of error messages thrown by the repository without cluttering the console output.
Refactored the `mapRowToTargetUnit` method in the `TargetUnitRepository` class to use an arrow function for improved readability and conciseness. This change enhances the clarity of the code while maintaining the same functionality.
Deleted the `TargetUnitService` class and its associated test file to streamline the codebase. This change eliminates unnecessary complexity and focuses on more relevant components, enhancing overall maintainability.
Added the `TargetUnitService` class along with its corresponding test file to manage target unit retrieval from the repository. This implementation enhances the functionality of the service layer by providing a dedicated method for fetching target units, improving code organization and maintainability.
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant TargetUnitService
participant ITargetUnitRepository
Client->>TargetUnitService: getTargetUnits()
TargetUnitService->>ITargetUnitRepository: getTargetUnits()
ITargetUnitRepository-->>TargetUnitService: TargetUnit[]
TargetUnitService-->>Client: TargetUnit[]
Possibly related PRs
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
🔍 Vulnerabilities of
|
digest | sha256:da30eca7154c7c4cb2616e31f7411021ea9146d5b15c68adf2a57df4c52b164c |
vulnerabilities | |
platform | linux/amd64 |
size | 218 MB |
packages | 358 |
📦 Base Image alpine:3
also known as |
|
digest | sha256:1c4eef651f65e2f7daee7ee785882ac164b02b78fb74503052a26dc061c90474 |
vulnerabilities |
Description
| ||||||||||||
Description
| ||||||||||||
Description
| ||||||||||||
Description
| ||||||||||||
Description
| ||||||||||||
Description | ||||||||||||
Description
| ||||||||||||
Description
| ||||||||||||
Description
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
workers/main/src/services/TargetUnit/TargetUnitService.test.ts (2)
35-35
: Fix inconsistent terminology in test description.The test description mentions "project units" but should be "target units" to match the service name and functionality.
- it('should return project units from the repository', async () => { + it('should return target units from the repository', async () => {
35-44
: Consider adding additional test coverage.While the current test covers the happy path well, consider adding tests for:
- Error handling when the repository throws an exception
- Edge cases like empty arrays from the repository
Example additional test:
it('should propagate repository errors', async () => { const error = new Error('Repository error'); mockRepo.getTargetUnits.mockRejectedValueOnce(error); await expect(service.getTargetUnits()).rejects.toThrow('Repository error'); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
workers/main/src/services/TargetUnit/TargetUnitService.test.ts
(1 hunks)workers/main/src/services/TargetUnit/TargetUnitService.ts
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
workers/main/src/services/TargetUnit/TargetUnitService.ts (2)
workers/main/src/services/TargetUnit/ITargetUnitRepository.ts (1)
ITargetUnitRepository
(3-5)workers/main/src/common/types.ts (1)
TargetUnit
(1-12)
workers/main/src/services/TargetUnit/TargetUnitService.test.ts (2)
workers/main/src/common/types.ts (1)
TargetUnit
(1-12)workers/main/src/services/TargetUnit/TargetUnitService.ts (1)
TargetUnitService
(4-10)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
- GitHub Check: Docker Security Scanning (temporal, Dockerfile.temporal, temporal-test:latest)
- GitHub Check: Docker Security Scanning (n8n, Dockerfile.n8n, n8n-test:latest)
- GitHub Check: SonarQube
- GitHub Check: Service Availability Check
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
workers/main/src/services/TargetUnit/TargetUnitService.ts (1)
1-10
: LGTM! Clean implementation following dependency injection pattern.The service implementation is well-structured with proper dependency injection and clear method signatures. The simple delegation pattern provides a clean service layer abstraction that can be extended in the future if additional business logic is needed.
workers/main/src/services/TargetUnit/TargetUnitService.test.ts (2)
6-16
: LGTM! Good use of helper functions for test data creation.The
createTargetUnit
helper function with default values and override capability is a clean pattern that makes tests more readable and maintainable.
18-33
: LGTM! Proper test setup and teardown.The test setup follows Vitest best practices with proper mock creation, initialization, and cleanup.
|
Pull request was converted to draft
Added the
TargetUnitService
class along with its corresponding test file to manage target unit retrieval from the repository. This implementation enhances the functionality of the service layer by providing a dedicated method for fetching target units, improving code organization and maintainability.