-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Fix fabric8 client dependency (related to issue 900) #905
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix fabric8 client dependency (related to issue 900) #905
Conversation
This PR should go after this one and then changes will make a lot more sense. I did not want to muddy the waters in that PR, that fixes an actual problem... When that one is merged, I'll comment on this one more if needed. But basically the idea is the same as there, we track |
</exclusions> | ||
</dependency> | ||
|
||
<dependency> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is the actual change in this PR, we should drop kubernetes-client
explicit dependency, it is managed by bom anyway
Seems like some of these changes duplicate whats in #904 |
right, I branched from that one - because otherwise the build would have failed. That is why I said that if we agree on that one and merge it, and then look at this one, it will make more sense (the overlapping changes would not be present) |
@@ -245,24 +245,6 @@ | |||
<scope>test</scope> | |||
</dependency> | |||
|
|||
<dependency> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that now it makes a lot more sense - just like the mock server removal, we remove client also. It has the same <scope>test</scope>
@@ -84,6 +84,13 @@ | |||
<dependency> | |||
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId> | |||
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId> | |||
<!-- in favor of mockito-inline --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
some tests were failing, so need mockito-inline.
@ryanjbaxter it should make a lot more sense now |
No description provided.