Skip to content

Fix typo: Correct "intial" to "initial" in parameter names and comments #46508

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

shchae04
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request fixes a recurring typo where "intial" was used instead of the correct spelling "initial". The typo was found in:

  • Variable and parameter names
  • Code comments
  • Test method names

Changes

  • Renamed all instances of intial to initial in both source and test files.
  • Updated corresponding comments and documentation for consistency.

These changes do not affect any runtime behavior or public API and are limited to improving code readability and correctness.

No functional changes are introduced.

…ts across test and source files.

Signed-off-by: shchae04 <[email protected]>
@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Jul 23, 2025
@philwebb philwebb added type: task A general task and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Jul 23, 2025
@philwebb philwebb added this to the 3.4.x milestone Jul 23, 2025
@snicoll snicoll self-assigned this Jul 23, 2025
@snicoll snicoll modified the milestones: 3.4.x, 4.0.0-M1 Jul 23, 2025
@snicoll
Copy link
Member

snicoll commented Jul 23, 2025

Moving to 4.0.x as the typo isn't applicable to 3.4.x and 3.5.x.

snicoll pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
@snicoll snicoll closed this in 89285eb Jul 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: task A general task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants