-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
RedisNode
creation from bare hostname assigns default port
#3002
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
LeeHyungGeol
wants to merge
5
commits into
spring-projects:main
from
LeeHyungGeol:fix/redis_node_no_port
Closed
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
59b7535
Update RedisNode creation from bare hostname should assign default port
LeeHyungGeol 8145291
Update RedisNode creation from bare hostname should assign default port
LeeHyungGeol 2889a56
Update RedisNodeUnitTests code lint to Spring Data Code Formatting Se…
LeeHyungGeol ec2b6c6
Update RedisNodeUnitTests code lint to Intellij Default Settings.
LeeHyungGeol 4a5214e
Add comment about Apache License & author in the headers of the class.
LeeHyungGeol File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
src/test/java/org/springframework/data/redis/connection/RedisNodeUnitTests.java
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure what has happened here. In any case, this test is formatted to not be readable in any way.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mp911de
I apologize for the issue with the code formatting. I have identified the problem and am currently making corrections. I suspect that the cause of the formatting issue is related to code lint. Therefore, I checked the Spring Data Code Formatting Settings on this page: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-data-build/tree/main/etc/ide and I am applying those settings.
I am currently trying to apply
eclipse-java-google-style.xml
as the Eclipse code formatter. Do I need any other formatter?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mp911de
I have fixed the issue with the code formatting. I would appreciate it if you could review the PR again.