-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Deadlock in KafkaMessageSource - between isRunning and doReceive #8778
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Also good suggestion: spring-cloud/spring-cloud-stream#2838 (comment) |
artembilan
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2023
Related to #8778 **Cherry-pick to `6.0.x`**
artembilan
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2023
Related to #8778 **Cherry-pick to `6.0.x`**
artembilan
added a commit
to artembilan/spring-integration
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2023
Fixes spring-projects#8778 The `KafkaMessageSource.doReceive()` have a lock around its whole body. That includes the `pollRecord()` which can be blocked on the `KafkaConsumer.poll()`. This way the rest of lifecycle management callbacks can be blocked until `KafkaConsumer.poll()` returns. * Rework lifecycle management flags to `AtomicBoolean` since there is not too much work in their respective callbacks * Decrease a locking block in the `doReceive()` just to consumer setup part. Leave `pollRecord()` outside of the lock * Add `this.consumer.wakeup()` into `stopConsumer()` to break a `poll()` cycle and return immediately for the next `close()` call **Cherry-pick to `6.1.x` & `6.0.x`**
garyrussell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2023
* GH-8778: Fix KafkaMessageSource deadlock Fixes #8778 The `KafkaMessageSource.doReceive()` have a lock around its whole body. That includes the `pollRecord()` which can be blocked on the `KafkaConsumer.poll()`. This way the rest of lifecycle management callbacks can be blocked until `KafkaConsumer.poll()` returns. * Rework lifecycle management flags to `AtomicBoolean` since there is not too much work in their respective callbacks * Decrease a locking block in the `doReceive()` just to consumer setup part. Leave `pollRecord()` outside of the lock * Add `this.consumer.wakeup()` into `stopConsumer()` to break a `poll()` cycle and return immediately for the next `close()` call **Cherry-pick to `6.1.x` & `6.0.x`** * * Use `compareAndSet` in `start` & `stop`
garyrussell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2023
* GH-8778: Fix KafkaMessageSource deadlock Fixes #8778 The `KafkaMessageSource.doReceive()` have a lock around its whole body. That includes the `pollRecord()` which can be blocked on the `KafkaConsumer.poll()`. This way the rest of lifecycle management callbacks can be blocked until `KafkaConsumer.poll()` returns. * Rework lifecycle management flags to `AtomicBoolean` since there is not too much work in their respective callbacks * Decrease a locking block in the `doReceive()` just to consumer setup part. Leave `pollRecord()` outside of the lock * Add `this.consumer.wakeup()` into `stopConsumer()` to break a `poll()` cycle and return immediately for the next `close()` call **Cherry-pick to `6.1.x` & `6.0.x`** * * Use `compareAndSet` in `start` & `stop`
garyrussell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2023
* GH-8778: Fix KafkaMessageSource deadlock Fixes #8778 The `KafkaMessageSource.doReceive()` have a lock around its whole body. That includes the `pollRecord()` which can be blocked on the `KafkaConsumer.poll()`. This way the rest of lifecycle management callbacks can be blocked until `KafkaConsumer.poll()` returns. * Rework lifecycle management flags to `AtomicBoolean` since there is not too much work in their respective callbacks * Decrease a locking block in the `doReceive()` just to consumer setup part. Leave `pollRecord()` outside of the lock * Add `this.consumer.wakeup()` into `stopConsumer()` to break a `poll()` cycle and return immediately for the next `close()` call **Cherry-pick to `6.1.x` & `6.0.x`** * * Use `compareAndSet` in `start` & `stop`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
For more context: spring-cloud/spring-cloud-stream#2675
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: