Fix DSL to deal with beanNames for handlers #2707
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When consumer endpoint is created by the Framework, the target
MessageHandler
gets acomponentName
from theConsumerEndpointFactoryBean
.Therefore we can't rely on the
getComponentName()
when we create beansfrom Java DSL.
NamedComponent.getBeanName()
contract; make it defaultto the
getComponentName()
; implement this method from theIntegrationObjectSupport
getBeanName()
from theIntegrationFlowBeanPostProcessor
and
StandardIntegrationFlowContext
for better existing beans checksand possible reuse existing
MessageHandler
in different endpointsFixedSubscriberChannel
and implementgetBeanName()
over theregetBeanName()
in theAbstractMessageSource
; useExpressionEvalMap
to evaluate headers expressionsgetBeanName()
inTrackable*Metrics
classes as delegationto the
this.trackable