Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allow for customization of IssuerResolver #9005
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow for customization of IssuerResolver #9005
Changes from all commits
aac9194
f8a3663
3fdb9c2
86c51b2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we are using a setter for the issuer converter, this constructor is unnecessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add JavaDoc, including a
@since 5.5
so it's clear when the method became available.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please check for
null
here usingAssert.notNull
, as you did earlier in the constructor.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, I believe it would be a bit more consistent with the rest of Spring Security to call this
setIssuerResolver
. It's certainly reminiscent ofBearerTokenResolver
in its role in the request.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, out of curiosity, do you have a use case where you need the more generic contract of
Converter<HttpServletRequest, String>
? If not,setBearerTokenResolver
may be better since that's likely the most common use case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jzheaux the problem is that you cannot set the
BearerTokenResolver
on theissuerConverter
as it is of typeConverter<HttpServletRequest,String>
. So either you replace the entire thing or you would need to add a setter on that one as well and change the type of theissuerConverter
attribute directly toJwtClaimIssuerConverter
. What do you think?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with you that adding a setter to
JwtClaimIssuerConverter
would be one way to do it, though it would remain private.One nice thing about using
BearerTokenResolver
is that it simplifies the API and focuses on the most common use cases. It seems like a very uncommon use case to pull the issuer from somewhere else in the request other than the token itself.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's leave these changes regarding
JwtAuthenticationConverter
for later.