Skip to content

revert: Temporarily revert #950 #987

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2025
Merged

revert: Temporarily revert #950 #987

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2025

Conversation

Techassi
Copy link
Member

@Techassi Techassi commented Mar 19, 2025

This reverts commit cbb7cc5.

This revert is needed, because another stackable-operator release before SDP 25.3.0 is required to fix a breaking change in kube which is only encountered during runtime.

2025-03-19T14:37:07.285064Z  INFO stackable_operator::utils::logging: Starting Stackable Operator for Apache Superset
2025-03-19T14:37:07.285095Z  INFO stackable_operator::utils::logging: This is version 0.0.0-dev (Git information: c7273b5), built for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu by rustc 1.84.1 (e71f9a9a9 2025-01-27) at Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:14:33 +0000
thread 'main' panicked at /root/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/rustls-0.23.25/src/crypto/mod.rs:249:14:
no process-level CryptoProvider available -- call CryptoProvider::install_default() before this point
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace

A more detailed explanation of the issue and how it is fixed will be provided in the upcoming fix PR: #988.

@Techassi Techassi added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 19, 2025
@Techassi Techassi moved this from Development: Waiting for Review to Development: Done in Stackable Engineering Mar 19, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 2a1a23c Mar 19, 2025
10 checks passed
@Techassi Techassi deleted the revert/pr-950 branch March 19, 2025 15:49
@lfrancke lfrancke moved this from Development: Done to Done in Stackable Engineering Mar 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants