Add and and or functions
#799
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When you're programmatically building a query to execute, you have times where you build a variable number of clauses by which you filter a table. There isn't a great way to turn an `Array<Expression<Bool>>` into an `Expression<Bool>`, short of making a large `(a AND (b AND (c AND (d AND e))))` expression. `and` and `or` fix this by allowing you to turn an `Array<Expression<Bool>>` directly into a lower-complexity clause: `(a AND b AND c AND d AND e)`
|
Hello? |
|
Cool! |
|
Would this replace the |
|
A year and a half later, I find myself needing this again. Is there anyone around who's interested in merging this? |
sergeymild
added a commit
to sergeymild/SQLite.swift
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2020
nathanfallet
approved these changes
Aug 18, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When you're programmatically building a query to execute, you have times where you build a variable number of clauses by which you filter a table. There isn't a great way to turn an
Array<Expression<Bool>>into anExpression<Bool>, short of making a large(a AND (b AND (c AND (d AND e))))expression.andandorfix this by allowing you to turn anArray<Expression<Bool>>directly into a lower-complexity clause:(a AND b AND c AND d AND e)