fix: dynamic event delegation for stateful call expressions

[paoloricciuti]

Svelte 5 rewrite

Closes #12520

In theory there could be some weird syntax for CallExpression that is not catched by the callee be an Identifier or a MemberExpression but i think the same assumption is also made for normal variables right?

The options could be:

1. always use dynamic function for even delegations in case of CallExpression
2. give CallExpression is own branch in the if with more thorough checks

Should i do any of the two?

Please note that the Svelte codebase is currently being rewritten for Svelte 5. Changes should target Svelte 5, which lives on the default branch (main).

If your PR concerns Svelte 4 (including updates to svelte.dev.docs), please ensure the base branch is svelte-4 and not main.

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

• It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. In many cases, features are absent for a reason. For large changes, please create an RFC: https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs
• Prefix your PR title with feat:, fix:, chore:, or docs:.
• This message body should clearly illustrate what problems it solves.
• Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.

Tests and linting

• Run the tests with pnpm test and lint the project with pnpm lint

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 5998481

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
svelte	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[trueadm]

1. seems fine to me, FWIW

[paoloricciuti]

1. seems fine to me, FWIW

Great then I think it would be a better option...pushing in a moment ✌🏻

[trueadm]

1. seems fine to me, FWIW

Great then I think it would be a better option...pushing in a moment ✌🏻

Already done lol #12549.

[paoloricciuti]

1. seems fine to me, FWIW

Great then I think it would be a better option...pushing in a moment ✌🏻

Already done lol #12549.

It's fine then, feel free to close this 😁