Skip to content

fix: don't try to add owners to non-$state class fields #14533

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/giant-windows-dance.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
'svelte': patch
---

fix: don't try to add owners to non-`$state` class fields
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -184,17 +184,22 @@ export function ClassBody(node, context) {
'method',
b.id('$.ADD_OWNER'),
[b.id('owner')],
Array.from(public_state.keys()).map((name) =>
b.stmt(
b.call(
'$.add_owner',
b.call('$.get', b.member(b.this, b.private_id(name))),
b.id('owner'),
b.literal(false),
is_ignored(node, 'ownership_invalid_binding') && b.true
Array.from(public_state)
// Only run ownership addition on $state fields.
// Theoretically someone could create a `$state` while creating `$state.raw` or inside a `$derived.by`,
// but that feels so much of an edge case that it doesn't warrant a perf hit for the common case.
.filter(([_, { kind }]) => kind === 'state')
.map(([name]) =>
b.stmt(
b.call(
'$.add_owner',
b.call('$.get', b.member(b.this, b.private_id(name))),
b.id('owner'),
b.literal(false),
is_ignored(node, 'ownership_invalid_binding') && b.true
)
)
)
),
),
true
)
);
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
/** @import { AST, TemplateNode } from '#compiler' */
/** @import { ComponentContext } from '../../types.js' */
import { dev, is_ignored } from '../../../../../state.js';
import { get_attribute_chunks } from '../../../../../utils/ast.js';
import { get_attribute_chunks, object } from '../../../../../utils/ast.js';
import * as b from '../../../../../utils/builders.js';
import { create_derived } from '../../utils.js';
import { build_bind_this, validate_binding } from '../shared/utils.js';
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -176,16 +176,26 @@ export function build_component(node, component_name, context, anchor = context.
bind_this = attribute.expression;
} else {
if (dev) {
binding_initializers.push(
b.stmt(
b.call(
b.id('$.add_owner_effect'),
b.thunk(expression),
b.id(component_name),
is_ignored(node, 'ownership_invalid_binding') && b.true
const left = object(attribute.expression);
let binding;
if (left?.type === 'Identifier') {
binding = context.state.scope.get(left.name);
}
// Only run ownership addition on $state fields.
// Theoretically someone could create a `$state` while creating `$state.raw` or inside a `$derived.by`,
// but that feels so much of an edge case that it doesn't warrant a perf hit for the common case.
if (binding?.kind !== 'derived' && binding?.kind !== 'raw_state') {
binding_initializers.push(
b.stmt(
b.call(
b.id('$.add_owner_effect'),
b.thunk(expression),
b.id(component_name),
is_ignored(node, 'ownership_invalid_binding') && b.true
)
)
)
);
);
}
}

const is_store_sub =
Expand Down
Loading