-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 229
Fix broken errors thrown by JSONDecoder when parsing decimal as Int
#1606
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
hiragram
wants to merge
1
commit into
swiftlang:main
Choose a base branch
from
hiragram:fix-jsondecoder
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we need to preserve this existing (broken) behavior for FOUNDATION_FRAMEWORK as long as
underlyingError's error code is untouched... @kperryua what do you think?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@itingliu Thanks for your review. Just to confirm, are you saying that
underlyingErrorshould always benil on all platforms in this case?
There is existing code that switches the presence of
underlyingErrorbased on theFOUNDATION_FRAMEWORKflag, which I used as a reference. I don't fully understand the intent behind it, but I think it would be better to keep the behavior consistent.https://github.com/hiragram/swift-foundation/blob/fix-jsondecoder/Sources/FoundationEssentials/JSON/JSONDecoder.swift#L388-L393
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In retrospect, a
JSONErrorseems incorrect here to begin with, as we've already pre-validated the buffer and successfully parsed some a number. Hence, it's valid JSON. (If we fail to parse, we callvalidateNumberafterwards, which gives us a JSONError that tells us exactly what's wrong.)We should just be throwing the
dataCorruptederror with no underlying error at all, on all platforms.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kperryua Should that be handled in this Pull Request? Personally, I think it's better to first fix the specific broken behaviors and have the discussion about what the "grand design" should look like in a separate thread.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wouldn’t consider this a “grand design” change. It’s a simplification of this PR by virtue of realigning this particular error throwing instance with the correct layering of errors. Nothing about the PR needs to change except eliding the creation of the underlying error (and the corresponding test code).