Skip to content

Should the public API include Codable types? #107

Open
@jakepetroules

Description

@jakepetroules

The following types conform to Codable:

  • ProcessIdentifier
  • TerminationStatus
  • ExecutionResult (conditionally)
  • CollectedResult (conditionally)

This seems like a surprising thing to forever commit to as part of the public API. Should we reconsider whether these protocol conformances should be present before the 1.0 release? It's unclear to me what the value persisting these types would be.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions