Skip to content

[build] Remove forced tracing of lldb dotest #34167

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2020

Conversation

kastiglione
Copy link
Contributor

Remove -t from DOTEST_ARGS. This causes verbose output of lldb tests that can't be overridden when calling dotest directly. It appears the initial use of -t was introduced for a legacy xcodebuild path in #20090, and then the flag got propagated in other dotest related changes.

Copy link
Contributor

@JDevlieghere JDevlieghere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@kastiglione
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci smoke test

@kastiglione
Copy link
Contributor Author

I wonder if this has any meaningful time savings when running the full test suite.

@JDevlieghere
Copy link
Contributor

JDevlieghere commented Oct 2, 2020

I wonder if this has any meaningful time savings when running the full test suite.

I don't know if it's significant, but we are parsing the dotest.py output to report a lit result which should be slightly faster now.

@kastiglione
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci smoke test Windows Platform

@kastiglione kastiglione force-pushed the dl/build-Remove-forced-tracing-of-lldb-dotest branch from 74a088e to 573886d Compare October 3, 2020 19:00
@kastiglione
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci smoke test

@kastiglione kastiglione merged commit f190342 into main Oct 3, 2020
@kastiglione kastiglione deleted the dl/build-Remove-forced-tracing-of-lldb-dotest branch October 3, 2020 22:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants