-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
[Macros] Mangle attached macro expansions based only on syntactic information #65032
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
DougGregor
merged 4 commits into
swiftlang:main
from
DougGregor:attached-macro-mangle-without-cycles
Apr 12, 2023
Merged
[Macros] Mangle attached macro expansions based only on syntactic information #65032
DougGregor
merged 4 commits into
swiftlang:main
from
DougGregor:attached-macro-mangle-without-cycles
Apr 12, 2023
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@swift-ci please smoke test |
1 similar comment
@swift-ci please smoke test |
@swift-ci please clean test Linux |
1 similar comment
@swift-ci please clean test Linux |
@swift-ci please smoke test |
1 similar comment
@swift-ci please smoke test |
…ormation The mangling of attached macro expansions based on the declaration to which they are attached requires semantic information (specifically, the interface type of that declaration) that caused cyclic dependencies during type checking. Replace the mangling with a less-complete mangling that only requires syntactic information from the declaration, i.e., the name of the declaration to which the macro was attached. This eliminates reference cycles that occur with attached macros that produce arbitrary names.
…ssors Adding accessors to a stored property, which removes its initializer. Force computation of the interface type first. There are better ways to model this in the AST, but it requires reworking how we handle initializers to break them into requests.
2a17401
to
fb82b8f
Compare
@swift-ci please smoke test |
@swift-ci please clean smoke test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The mangling of attached macro expansions based on the declaration to which they are attached requires semantic information (specifically, the interface type of that declaration) that caused cyclic dependencies during type checking. Replace the mangling with a less-complete mangling that only requires syntactic information from the declaration, i.e., the name of the declaration to which the macro was attached.
This eliminates reference cycles that occur with attached macros that produce arbitrary names.