Skip to content

Reapply "Task names" (#79562) #79600

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 8, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ktoso
Copy link
Contributor

@ktoso ktoso commented Feb 25, 2025

This reverts the revert #79562 and brings back #77609 with the task names APIs.

The reason for the revert was source compatibility was slightly off during the move to gyb

rdar://88918762

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 25, 2025

@swift-ci please test source compatibility

@ktoso ktoso force-pushed the wip-task-names-compat branch from 3dfedf6 to 8315565 Compare February 25, 2025 02:58
@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 25, 2025

@swift-ci please test source compatibility

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 25, 2025

@swift-ci please smoke test

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 25, 2025

@swift-ci please test source compatibility

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 25, 2025

@swift-ci please build toolchain

@ktoso ktoso changed the title Reapply "Merge pull request #77609 from ktoso/wip-task-names" (#79562) Reapply "Task names" (#79562) Feb 25, 2025
@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 25, 2025

Ongoing source compat infra issues:


warning: 'swift-log': skipping cache due to an error: Couldn’t fetch updates from remote repositories:
    Auto configuration failed
    140704406080320:error:02FFF001:system library:func(4095):Operation not permitted:/AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/4b66fb3c-7dd0-11ef-b4fb-4a83e32a47e1/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/libressl/libressl-3.3/crypto/bio/bss_file.c:122:fopen('/private/etc/ssl/openssl.cnf', 'rb')
    140704406080320:error:20FFF002:BIO routines:CRYPTO_internal:system lib:/AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/4b66fb3c-7dd0-11ef-b4fb-4a83e32a47e1/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/libressl/libressl-3.3/crypto/bio/bss_file.c:127:
    140704406080320:error:0EFFF002:configuration file routines:CRYPTO_internal:system lib:/AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/4b66fb3c-7dd0-11ef-b4fb-4a83e32a47e1/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/libressl/libressl-3.3/crypto/conf/conf_def.c:202:
warning: 'swift-service-lifecycle': skipping cache due to an error: Couldn’t fetch updates from remote repositories:

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 25, 2025

@swift-ci please test source compatibility

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 25, 2025

@swift-ci please test

Copy link
Contributor

@edymtt edymtt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The build system changes look good to me.

Copy link
Contributor

@etcwilde etcwilde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Build system changes look fine to me.
There are a few files where the ending newline was removed or just not inserted.

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 25, 2025

Thanks for checking! I still see issues with using the gyb generated funcs in the same module but we can revisit this at later point in time.

As soon as source compat suite works again I'll merge these

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 25, 2025

@swift-ci please test source compatibility

1 similar comment
@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 26, 2025

@swift-ci please test source compatibility

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Mar 4, 2025

@swift-ci please test

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Mar 4, 2025

preset=stdlib_S_standalone_minimal_macho_x86_64,build,test
@swift-ci please test with toolchain and preset
@swift-ci please smoke test

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Mar 5, 2025

@swift-ci please test macOS

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Mar 5, 2025

Source compat issues are not due to this PR but SIL lifetime issues mostly it seems.

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Mar 6, 2025

@swift-ci please test

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Mar 6, 2025

With the redeclaration notes fixed maybe this time can figure it out... Can't get the exact problem at desk heh

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Mar 6, 2025

@swift-ci please test

@ktoso ktoso force-pushed the wip-task-names-compat branch from 6df289d to 7066cb3 Compare March 7, 2025 03:32
@ktoso ktoso force-pushed the wip-task-names-compat branch from 0903e36 to 195271e Compare March 7, 2025 03:36
@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Mar 7, 2025

Thanks to #79812 we now found the mistake, thank you @xedin !

@ktoso ktoso force-pushed the wip-task-names-compat branch from ba650d6 to e7254c8 Compare March 7, 2025 04:02
@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Mar 7, 2025

@swift-ci please test

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Mar 7, 2025

foundationPackageTests.xctest: error while loading shared libraries: libFoundationEssentials.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

@ktoso ktoso force-pushed the wip-task-names-compat branch from e7254c8 to e051ac4 Compare March 7, 2025 09:13
@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Mar 7, 2025

@swift-ci please test

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Mar 7, 2025

@swift-ci please test Linux

@ktoso ktoso merged commit fda7f53 into swiftlang:main Mar 8, 2025
5 checks passed
@ktoso ktoso deleted the wip-task-names-compat branch March 10, 2025 02:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants