This happens a lot, I am not sure if it's regarding the training data bias but even though the vocal is selected as "female" and parsed correctly to the terminal, the model generates male vocals. Even if "female" is added to the custom styles and parsed to the terminal a second time ( "descriptions": "female, Female,) it can still produce a male vocal.
I don't know if it's the same situation with the male vocals (male selection produces female). Can anyone confirm that and if this is a training bias or a bug or not?
This happens a lot, I am not sure if it's regarding the training data bias but even though the vocal is selected as "female" and parsed correctly to the terminal, the model generates male vocals. Even if "female" is added to the custom styles and parsed to the terminal a second time ( "descriptions": "female, Female,) it can still produce a male vocal.
I don't know if it's the same situation with the male vocals (male selection produces female). Can anyone confirm that and if this is a training bias or a bug or not?