feat: Add new output with state machine name #63
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gdowmont
changed the title
antonbabenko
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2024
antonbabenko
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2024
## [4.2.0](v4.1.1...v4.2.0) (2024-03-22) ### Features * Add new output with state machine name ([#63](#63)) ([f421ef6](f421ef6))
|
This PR is included in version 4.2.0 🎉 |
|
Thanks for quick fix and release @antonbabenko |
|
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Add new output with StepFunction name
Motivation and Context
I have got an use case where I need to reference the name of step function.
Instead of hardcoding it I would like to obtain it from the module directly.
Breaking Changes
No Breaking Changes. Only adds new output based on existing variable name
How Has This Been Tested?