test(role-helpers): improve coverage of logRoles fn#1248
test(role-helpers): improve coverage of logRoles fn#1248naorpeled wants to merge 8 commits intotesting-library:mainfrom
Conversation
MatanBobi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for this one @naorpeled!
Left a minor comment.
timdeschryver
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR @naorpeled.
Because this PR contains 2 changes (types, and additional tests) I think it would be better to also create 2 focused PR.
This makes it easier to follow, and we have more control over the releases/history.
Fair point. |
|
@timdeschryver thanks for the great feedback. |
Co-authored-by: Tim Deschryver <28659384+timdeschryver@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Hey @timdeschryver, |
timdeschryver
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM.
Sorry, I missed the notification
All good :) |
What:
Increased the tests coverage of the logRoles and prettyRoles functions in the role helpers file,
at the moment cases with
hidden = trueoption were not covered.Why:
To further understand the scope of #1201 I've added these tests, I think it's good to have them in the repo.
Checklist:
docs site