Skip to content

Conversation

@okJiang
Copy link
Member

@okJiang okJiang commented Jan 30, 2026

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Close #10034

What is changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Code changes

Side effects

  • Possible performance regression
  • Increased code complexity
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Related changes

Release note

None.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the dco. labels Jan 30, 2026
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 30, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign zhouqiang-cl for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 30, 2026
@okJiang
Copy link
Member Author

okJiang commented Jan 30, 2026

/retest

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 86.00000% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 77.45%. Comparing base (65e429d) to head (798b87f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                       Coverage Diff                       @@
##           release-8.5-20260130-v8.5.3   #10197      +/-   ##
===============================================================
- Coverage                        77.59%   77.45%   -0.15%     
===============================================================
  Files                              463      463              
  Lines                            61110    61110              
===============================================================
- Hits                             47419    47331      -88     
- Misses                           10194    10278      +84     
- Partials                          3497     3501       +4     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 77.45% <86.00%> (-0.15%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Signed-off-by: okjiang <819421878@qq.com>
@okJiang okJiang force-pushed the release-8.5-20260130-v8.5.3 branch from 798b87f to 7f51870 Compare February 5, 2026 04:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the dco. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant