Make it possible to exclude pyarrow dep #276
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This allows client to exclude the pyarrow dep if they don't need it. Saved ~80MB and more compatible with older systems. Will still get a runtime error if they exclude it, then try to use it. Still works as expected unless users go out of their way to manually exclude this dependency (I'm not removing the dep, you need to manually exclude it).
|
@azahed98 @artek0chumak could you review this? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #274
pyarrow has a few issues:
This change allows client to exclude the pyarrow dep if they don't need it. It's only used for parquet file validation, which isn't needed by all users.
Note: I'm not removing the dependency- just making it run-time import. It still works as expected for all users, unless users go out of their way to manually exclude this dependency.
Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?
yes
Issue # #274