feat:Set operationId to serp_v1_serp__path__get for /v1/serp/{path}

[HavenDV]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the API specification for SERP endpoints (GET and POST at /v1/serp/{path}), adjusting operation identifiers. No changes to parameters, responses, or behavior.
• Chores
  • Synchronized internal API references to reflect the updated operation identifiers. No user-facing impact or functional changes.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

OperationId values in OpenAPI for both GET and POST on /v1/serp/{path} were changed from serp_v1_serp__path__post to serp_v1_serp__path__get. No other fields were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary of Changes
OpenAPI operationId updates src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml	For /v1/serp/{path}, updated operationId for GET and POST from serp_v1_serp__path__post to serp_v1_serp__path__get; no parameter/response/body changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• feat:Assign serp_v1_serp__path__get to GET and POST /v1/serp/{path} #504 — Same operationId updates to set both GET and POST to ...__get for /v1/serp/{path}.
• feat:OpenAPI 0.1.128; set GET/POST opId to serp_v1_serp__path__post #505 — Touches the same operationId entries, toggling between ...__get and ...__post.
• feat:OpenAPI: set shared operationId for GET and POST /v1/serp/{path} #540 — Modifies the identical lines for GET/POST operationIds on /v1/serp/{path} in the same file.

Poem

A bunny taps the spec with care,
Flips “post” to “get” with tidy flair.
Two paths align, no fields astray—
Metadata nudged to lead the way.
Hop, hop! The docs now rhyme,
OperationIds in perfect time. 🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch bot/update-openapi_202508311829

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

• Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

• MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3267af6 and b77fbe1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)

• src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathGetResponse.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
• src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathGetResponse.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
• src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathGetResponse2.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
• src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathGetResponse2.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (2 hunks)

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue

Duplicate operationId for GET and POST on /v1/serp/{path} will break client generation

operationId must be unique per operation. Having both GET and POST set to serp_v1_serp__path__get will cause OpenAPI tooling (codegen/SDKs) to collide or drop one method.

Apply this fix to restore uniqueness and match the file’s established naming convention:

@@
-      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
+      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post

Also applies to: 330-330

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml around lines 306 and 330, the GET and POST
operations for /v1/serp/{path} share the same operationId
(serp_v1_serp__path__get), which will break client generation; update the POST
operationId to follow the file’s naming convention and be unique (e.g., change
the duplicate at line 330 to serp_v1_serp__path__post), and scan nearby
operations to ensure no other duplicate operationIds remain.

---

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Quick check for any other duplicates in the spec

Run to surface any remaining duplicate operationIds before merging.

Also applies to: 330-330

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# List duplicate operationIds (with line numbers) in the spec
awk '/operationId:/ {id=$2; c[id]++; ln[id]=(ln[id]?ln[id] ",":"") NR} END {for (id in c) if (c[id]>1) printf "%dx %s at lines: %s\n", c[id], id, ln[id]}' src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml

Length of output: 228

---

Rename duplicate operationId serp_v1_serp__path__get
Appears twice in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (lines 306 & 330); operationIds must be unique.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml around lines 306 and 330, the operationId
serp_v1_serp__path__get is duplicated; change one of them to a unique,
descriptive operationId (e.g., serp_v1_serp__path__get_by_id or
serp_v1_serp__path__fetch) and update any internal references or client
generation artifacts that rely on the operationId; ensure the new name follows
the existing naming convention and then regenerate any OpenAPI-derived clients
or stubs.