feat:Set both /v1/serp/{path} operationIds to serp_v1_serp__path__post

[HavenDV]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Updated API documentation identifiers for certain endpoints to ensure consistent naming across methods. No changes to request/response formats or behavior.

• Chores

  • Harmonized operation identifiers in the public API specification to reduce ambiguity for client generation and tooling. Endpoints and semantics remain unchanged.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

OperationId values for GET and POST at /v1/serp/{path} in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml were changed so both operations now share the identifier serp_v1_serp__path__post. No parameters, responses, or other fields were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
OpenAPI operationId rename src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml	Updated operationId for GET /v1/serp/{path} from serp_v1_serp__path__get to serp_v1_serp__path__post; POST already or now also uses serp_v1_serp__path__post. No other schema changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• feat:Unify operationId for GET and POST on /v1/serp/{path} in openapi.yaml #565 — Renames GET operationId to serp_v1_serp__path__post, aligning GET and POST in the same file/path.
• feat:Set /v1/serp/{path} GET/POST operationId to serp_v1_serp__path__post #517 — Applies the same operationId rename for both GET and POST on /v1/serp/{path}.
• feat:OpenAPI 0.1.128; set GET/POST opId to serp_v1_serp__path__post #505 — Identical operationId updates on /v1/serp/{path} in the same OpenAPI file.

Poem

I twitch my whiskers at IDs that swap,
Two trails now share a single hop.
In docs I dig, in specs I boast,
One name to guide both GET and POST.
Thump-thump! The schema’s neat—let’s pop! 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The PR title "feat:@coderabbitai" is vague and does not describe the primary change in this branch (which updates operationId values in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml); it reads like a mention or tag rather than a concise summary a reviewer can scan to understand the change.	Please ask the author to replace the title with a short, descriptive statement of the main change (for example: "Fix duplicate operationId for GET/POST /v1/serp/{path} in openapi.yaml" or "Correct operationId naming for /v1/serp/{path}"), so reviewers can quickly understand the PR's intent.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch bot/update-openapi_202509140150

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (1)

1-361: Note: changing operationIds is a client-facing breaking change.

If SDKs are generated from this spec, this rename affects method names. Consider documenting in release notes and bumping API version (info.version) accordingly.

Also applies to: 362-1417

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77c63e8 and 2cadde4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)

• src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
• src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
• src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse2.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
• src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse2.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (2 hunks)

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue

Duplicate and incorrect operationId for GET /v1/serp/{path}.

GET and POST share the same operationId, which breaks many generators and SDKs. The GET should end with _get, not _post.

Apply this fix:

-      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
+      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
	operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml around line 306, the operationId for the GET
/v1/serp/{path} endpoint is incorrectly set to "serp_v1_serp__path__post"
(duplicating the POST operationId); change it to a unique value ending with
"_get" (for example "serp_v1_serp__path__get") so GET and POST have distinct
operationIds, update any references if present to the new operationId, and
ensure there are no other duplicate operationId values in the file.

[coderabbitai]

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Ensure operationId uniqueness across the spec and method-suffix consistency.

POST’s operationId looks fine; after fixing GET, confirm no other duplicates and that each operationId ends with its HTTP method suffix.

Run this script to verify:

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
pip -q install pyyaml >/dev/null

python - <<'PY'
import sys, yaml, re
p = 'src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml'
doc = yaml.safe_load(open(p))
ops = {}
dups = {}
bad_suffix = []
for path, methods in doc.get('paths', {}).items():
    for m, op in methods.items():
        if m.lower() not in {'get','post','put','patch','delete','head','options','trace'}: 
            continue
        oid = op.get('operationId')
        if not oid: 
            print(f"Missing operationId: {m.upper()} {path}")
            continue
        ops.setdefault(oid, []).append((m.upper(), path))
        # method suffix check (allow anything but recommend)
        if not oid.endswith(f"_{m.lower()}"):
            bad_suffix.append((oid, m.upper(), path))
for oid, lst in ops.items():
    if len(lst) > 1:
        dups[oid] = lst
if dups:
    print("Duplicate operationIds detected:")
    for oid, lst in dups.items():
        print(f"  {oid}: " + ", ".join(f"{m} {pa}" for m,pa in lst))
    sys.exit(1)
if bad_suffix:
    print("OperationId method-suffix inconsistencies:")
    for oid, m, pa in bad_suffix:
        print(f"  {oid} -> {m} {pa}")
    # non-fatal; exit 0 to allow discussion
else:
    print("No duplicates; suffixes consistent.")
PY

Length of output: 102

---

Fix duplicate operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post

GET /v1/serp/{path} and POST /v1/serp/{path} in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml both declare operationId serp_v1_serp__path__post — rename the GET operationId to end with _get (e.g. serp_v1_serp__path__get) or another unique name, then verify all operationIds are unique and end with the HTTP-method suffix.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml around line 330, the operationId for the GET
/v1/serp/{path} is duplicated with the POST's operationId
`serp_v1_serp__path__post`; change the GET operationId to a unique name ending
with `_get` (e.g. `serp_v1_serp__path__get`) and update any references that rely
on that operationId; then scan the file to ensure every operationId is unique
and follows the HTTP-method suffix convention.