Skip to content

Conversation

@HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Sep 20, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • No functional changes to endpoints.
  • Documentation
    • Updated OpenAPI specification to align operation identifiers for the SERP endpoint.
  • Refactor
    • Standardized operation IDs for GET and POST on the SERP path for consistency.
  • Chores
    • Harmonized API metadata to improve compatibility with client/SDK generation.
  • Notes
    • Endpoint behavior, parameters, and schemas remain unchanged.
    • Auto-generated SDKs may reflect renamed methods; update integrations if relying on operation IDs.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 20, 2025

Walkthrough

OperationId values for both GET and POST methods at /v1/serp/{path} in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml were updated to serp_v1_serp__path__post. No other parameters, schemas, or HTTP methods were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
OpenAPI operationId updates
src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml
For path /v1/serp/{path}, set both GET and POST operationId to serp_v1_serp__path__post (previously GET was serp_v1_serp__path__get; POST also changed). No parameter or schema edits.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A rabbit twitches ears, quite keen,
Two names now hop to one, so clean.
The paths unchanged, the labels swap—
IDs align with single hop.
I stamp a paw, review complete,
YAML fields in tidy beat. 🐇📝

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The title "feat:@coderabbitai" is not a concise description of the changeset and reads like a tag or username rather than a summary of the primary change. The PR actually modifies operationId values in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml for the /v1/serp/{path} GET and POST operations, which the current title does not convey. Because the title is vague and non-descriptive, it is insufficient to determine whether it accurately represents the changeset. Please replace the title with a short, specific sentence that highlights the main change, for example "fix(openapi): correct duplicate operationId for /v1/serp/{path} (GET/POST)". Also add a one-line PR description clarifying whether the operationId changes were intentional or a correction so reviewers can quickly understand intent. This will make the PR clear in history and easier to review.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bot/update-openapi_202509202116

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@HavenDV HavenDV enabled auto-merge (squash) September 20, 2025 21:17
@HavenDV HavenDV merged commit 2baf3b6 into main Sep 20, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@HavenDV HavenDV deleted the bot/update-openapi_202509202116 branch September 20, 2025 21:18
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Set GET/POST /v1/serp/{path} operationId to serp_v1_serp__path__post Sep 20, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b197bf9 and bb2ba8e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse2.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse2.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (2 hunks)

- serp
summary: Serp
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

🧩 Analysis chain

Duplicate and incorrect operationId on GET; must be unique and reflect the HTTP method

Both GET and POST use serp_v1_serp__path__post. This will collide in client code generation and is misleading for the GET operation. Fix by restoring a unique, method‑appropriate id.

Apply:

-      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
+      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get

Run to confirm operationId uniqueness:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
rg -nP '^\s*operationId:\s*(\S+)' src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml \
  | awk '{print $NF}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | head

Length of output: 476


Fix duplicate operationId in openapi.yaml — make GET id unique

GET and POST both declare serp_v1_serp__path__post (duplicate; confirmed). Update the GET operationId to a method-appropriate unique value.

File: src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (GET operation, around line 306)

-      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
+      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml around line 306, the GET operation reuses the POST
operationId `serp_v1_serp__path__post`; update the GET operationId to a unique,
method-appropriate identifier (for example `serp_v1_serp__path__get`) so it no
longer duplicates the POST id, and ensure the new name follows existing naming
conventions and is referenced consistently (if used elsewhere) in the file.

- serp
summary: Serp
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

🧩 Analysis chain

POST operationId rename may be API‑breaking; confirm intent and downstream impact

If clients/SDKs rely on operationId, this rename can break generated method names. Proceed only if intentional and coordinated (release notes + SDK regen).

  • Verify no other operation shares this id (after fixing GET).
  • If rename is unintended, revert to the previous POST id; otherwise plan SDK regeneration and announce in CHANGELOG.

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

file="src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml"

if [ ! -f "$file" ]; then
  echo "FILE_NOT_FOUND: $file"
  exit 0
fi

echo "=== SNIPPET: lines 320-340 of $file ==="
nl -ba "$file" | sed -n '320,340p' || true
echo

echo "=== operationId lines in $file (with 2 lines context) ==="
rg -n -C2 'operationId:' "$file" || true
echo

echo "=== All operationId occurrences in repo (file:line:value) ==="
rg -n --hidden 'operationId:' -S -g '!.git/**' || true
echo

echo "=== Duplicate operationId values across repo (showing >1 occurrences) ==="
python - <<'PY'
import re,glob,os
pat=re.compile(r'operationId:\s*(\S.*)$')
counts={}
locs={}
for path in glob.glob('**/*', recursive=True):
    if '.git' in path.split(os.sep):
        continue
    if not (path.endswith('.yaml') or path.endswith('.yml') or path.endswith('.json')):
        continue
    try:
        with open(path,'r',encoding='utf-8') as fh:
            for i,line in enumerate(fh,1):
                m=pat.search(line)
                if m:
                    v=m.group(1).strip()
                    counts[v]=counts.get(v,0)+1
                    locs.setdefault(v,[]).append(f"{path}:{i}")
    except Exception:
        pass
dups=[(k,counts[k],locs[k]) for k in counts if counts[k]>1]
if not dups:
    print("NO_DUPLICATE_OPERATIONIDs_FOUND")
else:
    for k,c,ls in sorted(dups, key=lambda x:-x[1]):
        print(f"{c}x {k}")
        for l in ls:
            print("  "+l)
PY
echo

echo "=== Search for serp_v1_serp__path__post / serp_v1_serp__path__get occurrences ==="
rg -n --hidden 'serp_v1_serp__path__post|serp_v1_serp__path__get' -S -g '!.git/**' || true

Length of output: 3568


Duplicate operationId 'serp_v1_serp__path__post' — fix before merge

Both occurrences will break client SDK generation; operationId values must be unique.

  • src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml — lines 306 and 330 both set operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post.
  • Action: if one entry is the GET endpoint, rename it to serp_v1_serp__path__get; if the POST rename was accidental, revert to the previous POST id; if the change is intentional, regenerate SDKs and document the breaking change in CHANGELOG/Release notes.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml around lines 306 and 330 there is a duplicate
operationId 'serp_v1_serp__path__post' which will break client SDK generation;
locate both occurrences and make the IDs unique: if the entry at one of these
lines is the GET endpoint rename it to 'serp_v1_serp__path__get', if the POST
rename at one line was accidental revert it back to the original POST id, and if
the change was intentional keep the new id and regenerate SDKs and add a note in
CHANGELOG/Release notes; ensure both operationId values are unique and
consistent with HTTP method semantics and update any references/tests that rely
on the old IDs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants