Skip to content

Conversation

@HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Sep 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated OpenAPI specification for the SERP v1 endpoint, revising operation identifiers for GET and POST on /v1/serp/{path}. No functional API behavior changes.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 21, 2025

Walkthrough

The OpenAPI spec at src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml updates operationId values for the /v1/serp/{path} GET and POST operations. Both are now set to serp_v1_serp__path__post. No HTTP methods, parameters, or schemas changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
OpenAPI operationId updates
src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml
Updated operationId for GET and POST on /v1/serp/{path} to serp_v1_serp__path__post; no changes to methods, parameters, or schemas.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A hop through specs, I tweak an ID,
GET and POST now share one key.
No paths rerouted, no fields displaced—
Just tidy tags, neatly replaced.
Thump-thump! says the review bunny, pleased,
Metadata aligned, confusion eased. 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The title "feat:@coderabbitai" is a terse, likely automated label and does not describe the PR's actual change, which per the raw_summary updates operationId values in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml for the GET and POST handlers on /v1/serp/{path}; because the title is vague and does not summarize the main change it is inconclusive under the provided criteria. Please rename the PR to a short, descriptive single sentence that highlights the primary change (for example: "fix(openapi): correct operationId swap for GET/POST /v1/serp/{path}" or "chore(openapi): update operationId for /v1/serp/{path}") so reviewers can immediately see the intent.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bot/update-openapi_202509210631

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@HavenDV HavenDV enabled auto-merge (squash) September 21, 2025 06:32
@HavenDV HavenDV merged commit b5096bf into main Sep 21, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@HavenDV HavenDV deleted the bot/update-openapi_202509210631 branch September 21, 2025 06:33
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Set /v1/serp/{path} GET/POST operationId to serp_v1_serp__path__post Sep 21, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb957cd and b9dacb1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse2.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse2.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (1)

330-330: Confirm POST operationId and ensure global uniqueness.

Assuming POST should be serp_v1_serp__path__post, keep as-is after fixing GET. Run the duplicate check above to confirm spec hygiene; duplicated operationIds can collide in generated clients.

- serp
summary: Serp
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

🧩 Analysis chain

Fix duplicate and method-mismatched operationId on GET.

GET currently uses serp_v1_serp__path__post, duplicating POST’s operationId and likely breaking SDK generation and tooling that assume uniqueness and method alignment. Change to serp_v1_serp__path__get.

Apply:

-      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
+      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get

Verify no duplicates remain:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Expect: no output (no duplicate operationIds)
rg -nP '^\s*operationId:\s*\K\S+' -o src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml | sort | uniq -d

Length of output: 0


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

file="src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml"
if [ ! -f "$file" ]; then
  echo "MISSING: $file not found" >&2
  exit 0
fi

echo "=== Showing $file lines 296-316 ==="
nl -ba "$file" | sed -n '296,316p' || true

echo
echo "=== operationId occurrences in the file (filename:lineno:line) ==="
rg -nP '^\s*operationId:\s*\S+' "$file" -S || true

echo
echo "=== All operationId values in repo with counts ==="
rg -nP '^\s*operationId:\s*\K\S+' src -o -S | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn || true

echo
echo "=== Duplicate operationId values (if any) ==="
rg -nP '^\s*operationId:\s*\K\S+' src -o -S | sort | uniq -d || true

echo
echo "=== get: blocks and nearby lines (showing operationId if present) ==="
rg -nP '^\s*get:' src -S | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | while read -r f; do
  echo "---- file: $f ----"
  awk '/^\s*get:/{start=NR; for(i=0;i<16;i++){getline; print NR ":" $0}}' "$f" || true
done

Length of output: 4244


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
file="src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml"
if [ ! -f "$file" ]; then
  echo "MISSING: $file not found" >&2
  exit 0
fi

echo "=== lines 280-340 ==="
awk 'NR>=280 && NR<=340 {printf "%4d: %s\n", NR,$0}' "$file"

echo
echo "=== rg context (±5 lines) for operationId serp_v1_serp__path__post ==="
rg -nC5 "operationId:\s*serp_v1_serp__path__post" "$file" || true

echo
echo "=== lines containing 'serp' ==="
rg -n "serp" "$file" || true

Length of output: 2809


Fix duplicate/mismatched operationId on GET
GET at /v1/serp/{path} in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (lines ~301–336) incorrectly uses operationId serp_v1_serp__path__post, duplicating POST; change GET’s operationId to restore uniqueness and method alignment.

Apply:

-      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
+      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml around line 306 (GET /v1/serp/{path}, lines
~301–336) the operationId is incorrectly set to "serp_v1_serp__path__post" (a
duplicate of the POST operation); change this GET operationId to a unique,
method-aligned identifier (e.g., "serp_v1_serp__path__get" or another
project-convention-compliant name) so operationId values are unique and reflect
the HTTP method.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants