Skip to content

Conversation

@HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Sep 22, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected operation identifiers for GET and POST on the SERP endpoint in the API reference, aligning names with the proper HTTP methods.
    • Improves clarity in docs, consistency across endpoints, and reliability of auto-generated SDKs, tooling, and IDE autocomplete.
    • No changes to API behavior, parameters, or response formats.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 22, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated operationId values in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml for both GET and POST methods under /v1/serp/{path}, setting them to serp_v1_serp__path__get. No other structural, parameter, or schema changes noted.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
OpenAPI operationId updates
src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml
For path /v1/serp/{path}, changed operationId from serp_v1_serp__path__post to serp_v1_serp__path__get for both GET and POST operations. No other changes detected.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

In YAML fields I hop with care,
Two IDs swapped to make them fair.
GET’s the tag for POST as well—
neat little tweak, no tales to tell.
I thump my paw; the docs align,
Carrot-high fives—commit looks fine! 🥕🐇

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The title "feat:@coderabbitai" is vague and does not describe the actual change in this PR (the diff updates operationId values in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml for the /v1/serp/{path} endpoints); it reads more like a tag or author mention than a concise summary of the main code change, so it does not help reviewers quickly understand the PR's purpose. Please rename the PR to a short, specific title that highlights the primary change, for example "fix(openapi): correct operationId for /v1/serp/{path} GET/POST" or "chore(openapi): update operationId in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml", so reviewers and future readers can immediately understand the intent.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bot/update-openapi_202509220153

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@HavenDV HavenDV enabled auto-merge (squash) September 22, 2025 01:54
@HavenDV HavenDV merged commit 692d4a0 into main Sep 22, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@HavenDV HavenDV deleted the bot/update-openapi_202509220153 branch September 22, 2025 01:55
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Update operationId for GET and POST /v1/serp/{path} in openapi.yaml Sep 22, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (1)

326-331: Rename POST operationId to reflect HTTP verb (serp_v1_serp__path__post)

No duplicate operationIds were found, but the POST currently uses a GET‑suffixed operationId which can mislabel SDKs — rename it.

File: src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (lines 326-331)

-      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
+      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e30119c and a18a2ee.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathGetResponse.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathGetResponse.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathGetResponse2.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathGetResponse2.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (1)

302-307: Confirm external SDKs/clients unaffected by operationId rename

operationId "serp_v1_serp__path__get" is present only in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (lines 306 and 330); no other in-repo references were found. Verify external/generated SDKs, generator configs, or published clients that may depend on the previous operationId — regenerate/update clients and bump versions if any dependents exist.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants