split build jvm,add workers to kernel#2189
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2189 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.75% 94.73% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 330 330
Lines 5568 5582 +14
Branches 201 207 +6
==========================================
+ Hits 5276 5288 +12
- Misses 292 294 +2
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
|
||
| addCommandAlias("buildTestingJVM", ";kernelLawsJVM/test;lawsJVM/test;testkitJVM/test;testsJVM/test") | ||
|
|
||
| addCommandAlias("buildJVM", ";macrosJVM/test;kernelJVM/test;buildTestingJVM;jvm/test;coreJVM/test;freeJVM/test;buildAlleycatsJVM") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sorry to nitpick, but this gets harder for me to track what's included in what. maybe we break out a "buildKernelJVM" and a "buildFreeJVM" too for the sake of a clearer structure? Just a thought.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Heh. I originally had:
-addCommandAlias("buildJVM", ";macrosJVM/test;kernelJVM/test;kernelLawsJVM/test;lawsJVM/test;testkitJVM/test;testsJVM/test;jvm/test;coreJVM/test;freeJVM/test;alleycatsCoreJVM/test;alleycatsLawsJVM/test;alleycatsTestsJVM/test")
Ha! Not a problem to break up more, it's more confusing than it should be whatever we do, so I thought I should PR something to get some thoughts. I'll update it now.
|
Those two codecov are from #2182, merged two hours ago |
|
seems fine to me, but does not seem to have sped up the build. was there another goal? |
Speed was not the issue, rather OOM in CI - eg see https://travis-ci.org/BennyHill/cats/jobs/352007704 and chat in gitter before and after https://gitter.im/typelevel/cats-dev?at=5aa55b886f8b4b994614b5c0 Original chat: https://gitter.im/typelevel/cats?at=5a99c17235dd17022e141d21 |
5 participants
Also tweaked the cache in travis, including
- $HOME/.cachefor javascript build artifacts