Skip to content

Update sbt-jmh to 0.3.7#2897

Merged
LukaJCB merged 1 commit into
typelevel:masterfrom
scala-steward:update/sbt-jmh-0.3.7
Jun 19, 2019
Merged

Update sbt-jmh to 0.3.7#2897
LukaJCB merged 1 commit into
typelevel:masterfrom
scala-steward:update/sbt-jmh-0.3.7

Conversation

@scala-steward
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updates pl.project13.scala:sbt-jmh from 0.3.6 to 0.3.7.

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention @scala-steward in the comments below.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

Ignore future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [{ groupId = "pl.project13.scala", artifactId = "sbt-jmh" }]

labels: semver-patch

@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #2897 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #2897      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   94.17%   94.2%   +0.02%     
=========================================
  Files         368     368              
  Lines        6949    6949              
  Branches      304     304              
=========================================
+ Hits         6544    6546       +2     
+ Misses        405     403       -2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...cala/cats/kernel/instances/FunctionInstances.scala 100% <0%> (+3.03%) ⬆️
testkit/src/main/scala/cats/tests/Helpers.scala 100% <0%> (+4%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f9b6a79...9da90cb. Read the comment docs.

@LukaJCB LukaJCB merged commit 3c97a61 into typelevel:master Jun 19, 2019
@kailuowang kailuowang added this to the 2.0.0-RC1 milestone Aug 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants