Skip to content

Drop cats-macros project#3231

Merged
travisbrown merged 2 commits into
typelevel:masterfrom
travisbrown:topic/drop-cats-macros
Dec 31, 2019
Merged

Drop cats-macros project#3231
travisbrown merged 2 commits into
typelevel:masterfrom
travisbrown:topic/drop-cats-macros

Conversation

@travisbrown
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think we should have done this after #2925. The cats-macros project is empty, so we might as well not publish it. I've also replaced the global -language:experimental.macros flag with an explicit import in the one place we need it, which is a small thing but doesn't hurt.

@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-io commented Dec 30, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #3231 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3231   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.05%   93.05%           
=======================================
  Files         376      376           
  Lines        7412     7412           
  Branches      192      192           
=======================================
  Hits         6897     6897           
  Misses        515      515
Flag Coverage Δ
#scala_version_212 93.38% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#scala_version_213 92.8% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
core/src/main/scala/cats/arrow/FunctionK.scala 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 851f03b...b3f64cd. Read the comment docs.

@travisbrown travisbrown merged commit 487d2a9 into typelevel:master Dec 31, 2019
@travisbrown travisbrown added this to the 2.2.0-M1 milestone Jan 14, 2020
agourlay pushed a commit to agourlay/cornichon that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants