Skip to content

FreeApplicative#hoist is same as compile#524

Merged
non merged 3 commits into
typelevel:masterfrom
adelbertc:freeapplicative-remove-hoist
Sep 13, 2015
Merged

FreeApplicative#hoist is same as compile#524
non merged 3 commits into
typelevel:masterfrom
adelbertc:freeapplicative-remove-hoist

Conversation

@adelbertc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Current coverage is 64.57%

Merging #524 into master will decrease coverage by -0.04% as of a91e5ed

@@            master    #524   diff @@
======================================
  Files          157     157       
  Stmts         2416    2419     +3
  Branches        66      66       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
+ Hit           1561    1562     +1
  Partial          0       0       
- Missed         855     857     +2

Review entire Coverage Diff as of a91e5ed

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@fthomas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

fthomas commented Sep 11, 2015

compile requires an Applicative[G] but hoist does not. If they are the same why don't we remove the one which is more restricted?

@adelbertc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Good catch - Applicative constraint was not necessary :-) The 2 are the same

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor typo here. I think you probably meant "Interpret this..."

@ceedubs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ceedubs commented Sep 13, 2015

👍

1 similar comment
@non
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

non commented Sep 13, 2015

👍

non added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2015
FreeApplicative#hoist is same as compile
@non non merged commit 7be80e5 into typelevel:master Sep 13, 2015
@non non removed the in progress label Sep 13, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants